Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'

h a l f b a k e r y
Business Failure Incubator

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: Browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

User:
Pass:
Login
Create account.


                 

Kaleidoscope on the Moon
I'm tired of the same old craters
  (+3, -4)
(+3, -4)
  [vote for,
against]


Instead of spending countless taxpayers' dollars on a space program that essentially lines the pockets of the super rich by extending super technology to them, I say spend them so we can actually enjoy them by setting up a giant kaleidoscope on the moon. Three impossibly long (and tall) mirrors set at 30 degree angles will give us a view of a six point star reflecting a fractured earth. As the Earth moves, the kaleidoscope changes, reflecting the weather patterns, rotation, seasons changing, or even a big black hole of outer space. A real life view of Earth, manipulated by man, to unify us in obvious folly. And hey- maybe the scientists could even figure out a way to use it.

Rm Brz, Oct 13 2006

[link]






       It sounds like it would be nice to look at, but not at the expense of the moon.   

       I still find it interesting.

fridge duck, Oct 13 2006
  

       wouldn't a kaleidoscopic telescope be easier?

po, Oct 14 2006
  

       Only if you were on the moon to use it.

P-p-polly, Oct 14 2006
  

       //impossibly long (and tall) mirrors//   

       You said it yourself. [mfd]

21 Quest, Oct 14 2006
  

       eh?

po, Oct 14 2006
  

       I used the term "impossibly" in a romantic sense- as in "ever-so", not a scientific one. And as for a kaleidoscopic telescope- as we are situated here on Earth, a kaleidoscopic telescope would reflect outward, not creating the introspective result I was hoping for- I want something that we can all enjoy worldwide, and for free.

Rm Brz, Oct 14 2006
  

       Free!?!   

       //Instead of spending countless taxpayers' dollars on a space program that essentially lines the pockets of the super rich by extending super technology to them, I say spend them so we can actually enjoy them//   

       That is going to cost a *lot* of tax dollars. Not to mention the fact that such a venture would invariably result in an expansion of the existing space program, still //lining the pockets of the super rich//. Space construction on that level is bound to be a massive project. It would make the cost of the Big Dig look like a ten-year-old's allowance.

21 Quest, Oct 14 2006
  
      
[annotate]
  


 
back: main index
 business 
 car 
 computer 
 culture 
 fashion 
 food 
 halfbakery 
 home 
 other 
 product 
 public 
 science 
 sport