Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'

h a l f b a k e r y
Naturally low in facts.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: Browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

User:
Pass:
Login
Create account.


              Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.

Nutritious Nappies
Used nappies provide irrigation to the drought-stricken regions
  (+3, -4)
(+3, -4)
  [vote for,
against]


Millions of disposable nappies are placed into landfill sites in damp western countries such as the UK. Rotting slowly they constitute a serious problem to the environment.

Why not send this resource to drought-stricken regions? The modern nappy is designed to contain copious amounts of liquid. Once shredded these would providen water and trap any desert morning dew. Both urine and faeces are excellent fertilizers, just ask any tomato...

The little pictures on the material would provide welcome relief to passing nomads from the unrelenting sun... (i.e. indicate where to pee...)

As they say at Oxfam...

"Give a man a fish, and he eats for one day, Give a man a steaming pile of nappies and he has irrigation for the a whole year..."


marmite, Mar 28 2001


Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee

Destination URL. E.g., http://www.coffee.com/

Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)







       ...and some seriously smelly countryside.

DrBob, Mar 28 2001
  

       I haven't ever excavated a landfill, but I consistently read that the contents actually do not rot, with the typical example being still-legible newspapers dug up after decades in the landfill. Also, the copious amounts of liquid stored in the used nappies/diapers are bound up in gels such that the water might evaporate, but would not be released into the soil. It could nourish plant roots only if the roots found their way to the gel.

beauxeault, Mar 28 2001
  

       Modern "sanitary" landfills are explicitly designed to avoid biodegradation, for a couple of reasons. One is, you can't have biodegradation without groundwater (and ideally some air), and there's too much stuff in the trash stream that you don't want getting into the groundwater --- cadmium, mercury, lead, not to mention biological stuff and toxic organics. The other reason is that biological activity is going to produce methane, which has been known to cause fires and explosions near old-fashioned non-sanitary landfills. (There are cogeneration plants which do the garbage-->methane-->electrical power thing on purpose, but they're not landfills.)   

       Fun book on the subject: _Rubbish_, William Rathje & Cullen Murphy.

wiml, Mar 28 2001
  

       PeterSealy, the Chinese have been using human waste for fertilizer for thousands of years for agricultural purposes.   

       The problem with BSE is the direct consumption of a certain protein. (i.e. You can't get BSE from eating tomatoes fertilised with mad cow's shit) Given that the liquid is controlled by the absorptive gel it would be similarly difficult to transmit any disease. Perhaps the use of the word irrigation is inappropriate in this case, as it connotes spraying the crops with urine ( This should be enough to ensure you can't sell the produce anyway)

UnaBubba, Mar 28 2001
  

       Hmm, this one gets my vote...   

       The osmotic pressure generated by plant roots would be able to extract water from the shredded nappy material.   

       A plant grown on 'nitrogenous waste' would not incorporate human viruses, etc (It would need a good wash though...)

riposte, Mar 30 2001
  


 
back: main index
 business 
 computer 
 culture 
 fashion 
 food 
 halfbakery 
 home 
 other 
 product 
 public 
 science 
 sport 
 vehicle