Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Your journey of inspiration and perplexement provides a certain dark frisson.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                           

Other,Energy,Thermal

Friction heat generator
  (+1, -2)
(+1, -2)
  [vote for,
against]

It’s time for us to take another design idea from our ancient ancestors and bring it into the present – namely rubbing two things together to get heat.

The heat generator that does not require electricity, a flame or flammable fuel.

This gadget would be roughly the size and shape of a single electric hot plate. It would be larger and heavier than a electric hot plate because it would be housing a high energy spring – sorta like the old Victrola record player spring only of new alloy and much higher energy - gear work, a flywheel and two friction surfaces, all of these units would be stacked inside sorta like pancakes. I envision it having a suitcase type handle on one edge so one can easily grab it and go.

One would first wind up the spring, then crank the flywheel up to speed. Once flywheel is at speed, a lever would be thrown to link the potential energy in the spring to the spinning flywheel through gearing. The two friction surfaces would create enough BTU's to cook pans of food, boil water and/or heat a room.

The friction heat generator could be useful in situations where standard space heaters can't or won’t work.

I'm sure there must be an energy/friction/heat formula that could give us a good idea as to how much mechanical and/or potential (spring) energy would be required for the needed amount of thermal units to cook or heat a room. Can one human put enough energy into a spring and flywheel to frictionally (or any other way for that matter) generate enough heat to boil water or heat a room?

Obviously, research needs to be done in the area of friction plates, the loss of energy in transmission from potential to torsional to thermal, etc.

The windmill powered friction oven is cool. What I have in mind is absolutely portable.

gorath, Aug 18 2004

[link]






       It would be wonderful if this could be made affordably enough where people in natural disasters could have it handy.
adamosity, Aug 18 2004
  

       The name field in the idea - the one that now says "Other,Energy,Thermal" - is for the name of the idea. For example, "friction hot plate" or something like that.   

       You can fix that by changing the title in the text field you see when you're logged in and looking at your own idea, then clicking on "OK".
jutta, Aug 18 2004
  

       This thing would be very weird to move about when the flywheel was turning because of the resistance to changes in the axis of spin. When I do my supervigorous workout the room does heat up, no doubt because of my efforts. I am wondering if friction is the best way to generate this heat. I can almost smell a burning brake pad smell emanating from your strange, warm, vibrating suitcase.
bungston, Aug 19 2004
  

       "...cook pans of food, boil water..."
That's one hell of a spring.
st3f, Aug 19 2004
  

       What is the rate at which a person can put out energy? I remember reading somewhere that it was around 35 Watts.   

       Most hotplates require at least 1000 watts.
neelandan, Aug 19 2004
  

       [needlan] therefore to acheive a cooking time of say 10 minutes at 1000W the human would have to input (1000/35)*10 = 286 mins or approx 4.8 hours of spring-winding. I doubt that the nutritional value of the food would compensate for that amount of effort.
dobtabulous, Aug 19 2004
  

       Is this not gonna wear itself out really fast?
david_scothern, Aug 19 2004
  

       (Rods tiger)A wheel is easy, but our ancient ancestors didn´t have it. That way of thinking will lead you to inaction, because our ancient ancestors should have done everything before. (gorath) You need to exercise a lot to produce enough heat. Your standard person can produce some 500 watts, using all available muscles. A radiating heater of 1000 watts is usually employed to heat a single room. (bungston) Of course a supervigorous workout heats a room without any mechanical contraption needed. Human body is a machine, after all. And how are your bones doing?. Anyway since the idea of a warm, noisy, vibrating, smelling and sproooing suitcase lifts my hearth, bun for you.
finflazo, Aug 19 2004
  

       This sort of thing has been used for friction welding pipes. One section is spun up, then pressed against a stationary section. Heat is generated, and voila, the pipes are joined.
ldischler, Aug 19 2004
  

       Energy is always conserved, but this process destroys great gobs of exergy. If you want work in and heat out, better to use a more-reversible process - in this case, a heat pump.
TerranFury, Aug 19 2004
  

       Humans,   

       My thanks for the responses on this gadget. Some of you seem to have missed the concept that this gadget is using friction heat, not generated electricity. Ancient man didn't try this because he didn't have the metalurgy sufficient for the spring. A gadget like this in the 1800's would have been massive. The friction pads would be of a special design specifically suited to temperatures around 400 degrees. Designed with heat creation in mind. We're talking about something that would get up to 400 degrees F almost instantly and maintain that temperature for 10-15 minutes per winding. It doesn't sound that far fetched to me. I encourage any/eveyone to try making one. We need such a device.
gorath, Aug 31 2004
  

       3.41 BTU/watt.   

       The Tour de France champion can produce about 300 watts of power, or about 1000 BTU/hr of heat. The burner on your gas stove can produce 8000 to 10,000 BTU/hr.   

       So the average person is going to be able to produce about as much useful heat as a candle.   

       Keep thinking!
RunVentura, Oct 04 2006
  

       I like how people admit they don't understand the physics of their idea, yet are willing to come out with numbers such as "up to 400 degrees F almost instantly and maintain that temperature for 10-15 minutes per winding" without actually knowing what it is they are talking about. No wait, I DON'T like it at all.   

       The above isn't even an equivocal statement of capacity. The output temperature will, of course depend on what it is the device is heating, for a given time period and capacity.   

       Simple physics mate: energy in equals energy out. If you can efficiently convert it, energy is the same, be it thermal, kinetic, potential, radiative, etc. So for a given thermal output, you'll need to "charge up" the device with the same or more potential energy. So to warm up a single cup of water from 20 to 80 degrees celcius, you'll need to input some 45 kJ of energy. That's the same energy as to lift a 1 tonne car 4.5 metres into the air. Or accelerate that car to say 35km/hr (ish). These are horribly rough numbers, but you get the idea ( I hope). People simply don't realise how much energy goes into heating things.   

       I can't bun this I'm afraid.
Custardguts, Oct 04 2006
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle