h a l f b a k e r y
You gonna finish that?
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
|
| |
google the word "rectenna" |
|
| |
The induction that is generated by radio waves is way to low. The only reason it can be heard on your radio receiver is because it gets amplified (which again requires some extra energy). |
|
| |
I think Tesla experimented a lot with over-air electricity transmission, he even managed to move the boat on the lake by electricity transmitted wirelessly. |
|
| |
y'know "rectenna" doesn't really sound like what it actually means. Sounds like a whole other HB idea, in fact. |
|
| |
If you've been around the right terminology, it makes sense. But I know what you mean. In fact, I bet many of us could even guess who would have posted it. |
|
| |
And what [DrCurry] would have thought it was. |
|
| |
They had that as an experiment on the "free energy" episode of the "Mythbusters" show on the US Discovery Channel. Summary: Yes, you can get energy out of it, but it's very little - even with a really long and unwieldy antenna, you get out barely enough to drive a digital watch. |
|
| |
[toomer34] Try to look at the specification of an ordinary FM radio - the sensitivity is usually quoted in microvolts. [-]
Remember the inverse square law. |
|
| |
//Google rectenna// Thanks [lurch], up until now i had thought a rectenna was that huge array that popped out of Cartman's arse sometimes. |
|
| |
so wat your saying is that becuse nobody could make a profit on this witch is acually very simple to fix its baked but not "Baked" ill leave it up still. to show of man's stupidity in not thinking of how to use it. two words "direct TV" |
|
| |
Broadcast is difficult, but beamcast is possible. Look into Solar Power Sattellites |
|
| |
When I hear the word "rectenna", I'm reminded of South Park, Episode 1. But seriously, the amount of energy picked up by an antenna is usually miniscule, needing lots of amplification before you can hear the signal. |
|
| |
If the beam is focused so that the majority of the energy gets to your antenna, then this works just fine (again, see "rectenna"). But without the associated focused transmission infrastructure, simply sticking out an antenna and hoping to collect enough stray radio waves to power anything more than a crystal earpiece or wristwatch is either wishful thinking or just plain bad science. |
|
| |
So: can power be collected from stray radio waves? Yes. Is it enough to do anything useful with? Not really. Is this a new idea? No. |
|
| |
well no one ever said that i got out much did they? |
|
| |
as i remember it this is not the only dud idea that has been baked befor and there still up i just hope this sad obomination of an idea gets off the front page befor more people see my mistake. |
|
| |
I thought building a radio without adding power to the circuitry was a halfbaking prerequisite, like putting cats in boxes, and shining light through holes in cardboard. |
|
| |
[Shz] You mean like a Crystal Set? |
|
| |
In my callow youth I made the obligatory crystal set and measured the voltage produced after rectification. We lived in a tall, thin house and I managed to use an antenna 40 feet in length. I recollect that Radio 2 medium wave (in those Mantovani days) yielded just over 50 millivolts. |
|
| |
...and my callow youth is most upset... |
|
| |
Hey, I did the crystal set thing too... the aerial stretched right down the garden and it lasted until we built an extension which rather terminally blocked the signal, i.e. it was built where the aerial used to be. |
|
| |