h a l f b a k e r y
No servicable parts inside.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
Login
Create account.
|
|
|
My computerless friend Gregg's idea: Twin Jenga is just like regular Jenga, but is played with two Jenga sets, placed fairly close together. Gameplay is as normal, except that during the game, at any time while an opponent is taking a turn, each player shall be allowed once to throw a paper airplane
at one of the stacks.
[link]
|
| |
Jenga .... when we did our EOD training, that was one of the games they gave us in the evening. |
|
| |
I built a stack of twins, once. Oh, what fun we had! |
|
| |
Someone should invent a hybrid of Jenga and Monopoly. |
|
| |
That's called property development, [IT]. A real-life game where the entire house can come crashing down with just one small misstep. |
|
| |
Also called the mortgage industry. |
|
| |
You don't subscribe, then, to the theory that your friend Gregg sabotaged your Jenga stack with demolition charges, thereby making the paper aeroplanes a mere distraction? (No, neither do I). |
|
| |
//Someone should invent a hybrid of Jenga and Monopoly.// |
|
| |
You've just inspired me to have a crack at it, [IT], see 'Jengopoly'. |
|
| |
Are you going to include a crackhouse piece? |
|
| |
// sabotaged your Jenga stack with demolition charges // |
|
| |
Nooooooo ..... the bits go ever so far, and people (especially the ones that have just been hit by small blocks of wood travelling at just-subsonic velocities) get Quite Upset and are Rather Vocal about their opinions, largely about being hit by bits of wood going very fast ..... you do NOT wish to do this. We have compelling evidence to support our assertion. Being made to sleep (during heavy rain) in a tent which has been riddled with wooden shrapnel will convince you of the veracity of our testimony. (Unless, of course, you are a VERY senior officer with a reputation for eccentricity) (which we were not). |
|
| |