h a l f b a k e r yRecalculations place it at 0.4999.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
I think the bang and flash would discourage any birds from using your feeder ever again. And possibly harm the bird if it ingests the small incendiary device. Get ready for a nasty fine from the EPA (or whatever the English equivalent is). |
|
| |
//the bang and flash would discourage any birds from using your feeder ever again// |
|
| |
Using bangs and flashes as scarecrows don't seem to discourage birds for more than a very short amount of time. Hence the need for the devices to go off many times per day. |
|
| |
//EPA// I guess that'll be the RSPCA (as I don't think the RSPB does enforcement). Anyhow, that would be for the real world (which this idea clearly ain't). Round here I think that [po] deals with all the avian transgressions. |
|
| |
And xenzag, too, I think. I just figured I'd be the first to point it out. |
|
| |
my sparrows can clean out the feeder in an hour. I do feel guilty when I neglect them though. I'd like this better, if the last bird to eat was not blown to bits though. |
|
| |
a better idea (if you really like birds - and if you're feeding them, I imagine you do) would be to have the last nibble go through a thread that's attached to the string that's holding it to the tree and so it falls to the ground. an alarm on the ground could then send a silent message to perhaps your mobile or your email!? |
|
| |
category: home - garden - wildlife. |
|
| |
Why don't you get sparrows with peanut allergies? |
|
| |
you do but you just don't see them. they're under the hedge gasping for breath |
|
| |
No need to blow up the last sparrow !
but rest of it's ok. Last peanut could
just be a switch, with no bang... Flag
could have a short message on it like:
HUNGRY!!! + |
|
| |
What might eventually happen, given evolution (if it exists) is that the birds learn to avoid the last nut, leaving it for the squirrels. |
|
| |
how about a loud screech to scare the birds from the immediate area before exploding. Oh yeah, why even disguise it as food? thats kinda mean. |
|
| |
If they evolved into boxes they could be
called Squarrels. |
|
| |
"don't squirrels evolve?" |
|
| |
tempted to post video of Droll Yankee squirrel-proof bird feeder...
or the squirrel stealing babe ruth candy bars from the dispenser... |
|
| |
Granny, please move this to a better category. |
|
| |
Squirrels don't evolve. They were
imported. |
|
| |
There should be a "There was an old lady.." Bird Feeder, that traps successively larger animals which are respectively lured to the feeder by preying on the previous animal. |
|
| |
//given evolution (if it exists)// |
|
| |
If you honestly feel the need to put a qualifier in parenthesis for evolution then you might as well put one in for everything. |
|
| |
In which case I should have wrote: |
|
| |
If you (if you exist) honestly feel the need (if it exists) to put a qualifier (if it exists) in parenthesis (if they exist) for evolution (if it exists) then you (if you exist) might as well put one (if it exists*) in for everything (if any of it exists). |
|
| |
*both item (if it exists) and concept of number (if it exists). |
|
| |
Problem is you'd probably have evolved into something unrecognisable by the time you finished writing a paragraph. |
|
| |
I don't believe in evolution. |
|
| |
feed the sparrows, who cares what gender YOU are. |
|
| |
voting plus eventually for the feeding idea anyway. |
|
| |
Mr Tindale having a Devo moment I see.
I like the idea as written. |
|
| |
//If they evolved into boxes they could be called Squarrels.// |
|
| |
*trying to contain laughter* |
|
| |
The birds Hitchcocking around your patio windows aren't alarming enough? |
|
| |