 h a l f b a k e r y Where life irritates science.
idea:
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, best, random
meta:
news, help, about, links, report a problem
account:
Browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
or Create a new account.
|
|
|
Make money fast: create an online prescription service to create bigger breasts
emphasize that hormones are better than surgery; I have read a medical product statement that said near half of women with breast surgery have another upgrade surgery after seven years; hormones even those that mimic pregnancy
should be the standard as I perceive the complication rate is perhaps hundreds of times less than surgery, it is only because there are different "surgery" or "pharmaceutical" medical cultures that cosmetic breast changes aren't just a prescription
The proper way is to write to a few gender change physicians online; tell them that pregnant women gain two cup sizes; tell them that with natural women able to bear live young you would like to mimic normal pregnancy with hormones to create bigger breasts
with the gender physicians protocol or any published protocol find a physician associated with a reputable university overseas, taiwanese or brazilian physicians are a possibility
if the physicians like the idea you should be able to start a click prescription service that truthfully makes breasts larger while being more medically beneficial than surgery
now, here is the actual invention: now that I've described that hormones are better than surgery the opportunity to describe or create new hormones comes up
estrogen linked to GABA (or any estrogen, possibly even estrogenic es-es-es polymer above 400 amu)will remain on the body side of the blood brain barrier, that means the body will be affected absent pms aspects like mood fluctuations
estrogen linked to a super lipophilic group will concentrate at various tissues, possibly fatty tissues or membranes
estrogenic substances that are more hydrophilic will concentrate at different areas, notably the skin this could provide a pregnancy glow effect absent the cytoproliferative risks of lipophilic estrogens
combinng the three effects of BBB, lipophilic, hydrophilic on different tissue systems a certain amount of shape guidance is possible
Also beneficial: surgery: a few thousand; two or three generic pills 30 or 40 per month
plus if the revenue was good you could go public, then the value of your company would be twenty or thirty times times earnings
you would be bringing women an authentic benefit; also the click prescription site could have a psychology quiz to perhaps prescripte a mood elevator like wellbutrin if there was an opportunity to create confidence The more traditional method of making money with generous breasts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striptease NSFW (even though it is wiki) [4whom, Jul 02 2008]
[link]
|
| |
1. Transgender folks already take estrogens for this.
2. Pharmacologic estrogens have fallen out of favor because they promote breast cancer. |
|
| |
The "invention" in this post is to avoid the mood-altering side effects of artificial estrogen by attaching the small estrogen molecule to larger "anchor" molecules that (a) prevent it from affecting the brain (b) direct it to specific tissue, e.g. breast tissue. (I have no idea whether that would work.) |
|
| |
This would have applications for transsexuals, keeping the risk of breast cancer the same while lowering the risk of mood disorders. |
|
| |
It's odd. Last week I was sitting opposite a quite convincing girl, though not a GG, and wondering about a possible time in the future that a person could elect to go through a non-surgical sex change that might take something like six weeks to grow into, somehow. And again, later, six weeks to grow back, if desired. |
|
| |
Beany, beany, beany. Why is finding the
actual idea in your posts like looking for
the proverbial needle in Loch Ness? |
|
| |
I think [Jutta] deserves a bonus prize for
catching the red herring amongst the wild
can of geese. |
|
| |
The problem is body image, which counselling can address to some extent. |
|
| |
Oestrogens seem to be defined as substances promoting endometrial cell mitosis in vitro (but presumably not, say, fibroblasts). That doesn't mean they're like biogenic oestrogens. They influence the progress of certain forms of cancer, particularly if the body can't make them water-soluble form, as they'll then sit there stimulating mitosis in certain tissues. Also, it doesn't follow that even a biogenic "oestrogen" defined in that way, will promote breast growth. Oestrogens bound to lipophilic compounds would be very carcinogenic. It's one of the worst things you could do to them. |
|
| |
However, some male to constructed female people might consider that a worthwhile sacrifice, as they see their quality of life as a man to be so low that a few years as a woman would be better than a century as a man. |
|
| |
As a gender-dysphoric man, i see gender reassignment as flawed, since to be a woman, you must be born female. Otherwise, you wouldn't have the experience throughout your life of having been perceived as female, which helps make you female. Transsexuals are depressed partly because they have realised that wasn't the problem, and on some level, their gender reassignment is sham. They are still male. It's much commoner for men to want to become women surgically than the reverse, so if they go through with this, they are making a stereotypically male decision. There's no escape. |
|
| |
[Jutta], i wish there was a place here i could go to vote for your diligence in untangling the meaning of that post. |
|
| |