Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
We don't have enough art & classy shit around here.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.



Breezy Boxers

The one-eyed snake in a one-legged fly
  (+3, -1)
(+3, -1)
  [vote for,

The brief description: To keep male members cool as cucumbers and hanging free as drying salami, instead of in on a limb, these boxer shorts have a third, lesser leg, front and center. Thanks to the extra piping on this smart, satin underwear you can pee hands-free and swing easily as a clapper in the bantam bell bottom.
FarmerJohn, Jul 13 2003

(?) view without pants http://www.geocitie...nie/aeroboxers.html
[FarmerJohn, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 21 2004]

YOUnique Boutique's colleciton... http://www.younique...ower/novelties.html
...of Male Power Novelty Underwear. Take your pick. [phoenix, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 21 2004]

(?) for 'Bubba, sans tusks http://www.lingerie...eys/412/412_200.jpg
[thumbwax, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]


       Well, golly I do like that alot. Plus again.
sartep, Jul 13 2003

       Kramer: “I’m out there, Jerry, and I’m loving every minute of it.”
Shz, Jul 13 2003

       These boxers are quite inventive, but leave much to the imagination. They're not very versitile, either. What happens when you wlak quickly/briskly? You dont want that baby's arm flapping between your legs. Stick to the boxer/breifs, men.
throwflamingrocks, Jul 13 2003

silverstormer, Jul 13 2003

       Surely your trousers (pants) would need to be similarly styled to allow free circulation? Of air, that is.
egbert, Jul 13 2003

       I'll style 'em if you wear 'em.
FarmerJohn, Jul 13 2003

       What, no tusks?
thumbwax, Jul 13 2003

       Those are called front end loaders.
Tiger Lily, Jul 13 2003

       Depends on your point of view.
egbert, Jul 14 2003

       //pee hands-free//: Not first thing in the morning! (I'm not going to have to explain this, am I?)
Cedar Park, Jul 14 2003

       Please don't.
egbert, Jul 14 2003

       Guys, if you had wood first thing in the morning ... wouldn't the shorts ... you know ... let too much go?
throwflamingrocks, Jul 14 2003

       maybe, but in that case, no pair of men's underthings would be any help
oxen crossing, Jul 14 2003

       Either gauche or adroit would certainly be more than obvious in these.
egbert, Jul 14 2003

       <Dr. Lily> Weeell now, how's your old popeyed pappy gettin' along these days?
Tiger Lily, Jul 14 2003

       Trying to stop laughing at [egbert]'s anno. People here are looking at me. snickersnicker
squeak, Jul 15 2003


back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle