h a l f b a k e r y
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
Vote on who you think is a Dumbass
I really think there whould be
some sort of Directory of Really
otherwise useless people. Like
you could nominate someone and
post that nomination. Somone
else seconds it and a bunch of
people vote on it. If more
people vote that your a dumbass
than not your name,
other information is posted so
people know not to deal with you
and to ask for someone else to
help them. Of course it would
need some sort of checks and
balances. For example, if you
nominate 10 people who are
either not seconded or are voted
not a Dumbass you automatically
are nominated and the people you
nominated get notified so that
they can second it. This would
prevent wide spread nomination
of normal people.
Business could get certified
that they have no dumbasses
working for them by an
independant agency, kind of like
ISO, Just think "Dumbass free
since (INSERT DATE)!"
||Baked. It's called a Presidential Election.
||I think you mean "Dumbasses." Get me to PA.
||I wish...My JOB is dealing with them...
||I wonder why so many people on here spend their time having a pop at typos when the point of this site is to comment on the ideas.
||[neuro] sometimes it's more fun that way - plus, it seems only polite to spend a little time in ensuring your idea is properly written, especially if you expect others to spend their time thinking and commenting on it.
||And then there are some ideas so void of any thought, that the only pleasure to be gained from them is picking out the grammatical and spelling errors.
||sp. whould, Imcompetant, Somone, independant
||The odd typo can be funny, but you can usually get away with a few in an idea.
||I see it slightly like maintaining standards. Whilst this probably sounds horribly elitist, I can't imagine anyone would rather see this site end up in txt spk like so many others are.