Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
This is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.



People Organ

or Theraputic Peopleophone
  (+4, -2)
(+4, -2)
  [vote for,

This would be an organ where each resonator and pipe is replaced by a person and each keying mechanism is replaced by a more human form of communication like direct touch, eye contact or vocal prompting.

It's sort of baked in the form of the monster-o-phone on the Muppet show where they guy hits monsters of varying sizes on the head with mallets and they "ouch" out tunes.

But instead of having the monsters facing away from the mallet weilder, and towards the camera, the "people" (in this case) should be facing the "organist-conductor" so that the organist-conductor can learn to play the people with eye contact, gesticulations and vocal prompting. Conventional signals could be worked out like hand gestures up and down for pitch, facial expression for volume, etc. It would be the ultimate test in conducting - conducting a choir without any score. Maybe this is common practice at vocal conservatories. I bet it would be a great way to practice group communication. Another thing would be to let each choir member improvise a little according to what they hear around them. Another option would be to incorporate touch as part of the control mechanism -- so that the choir members would crowd around the conductor so that he could manipulate them by touch maybe stretching their arms out with pitch lines drawn on the arm so that the conductor could play a keyboard made of arms -- although this would be closer to the Muppet version. The touch version might make it easier for the conductor to become a physical virtuoso.

The possibilites for two people playing eachother like this would probably be pretty interesting as well. Two people touch eachother with anti-mirror symetry, say each reaching out a right hand to touch the other's left elbow and singing unison tones. Then each could move their hand on the other's body as well as changing their own voice in response to the other's hand movements on their body. Conventions could be worked out in real time. Limits could be drawn or dispensed or negotiated in real time. I guess this could also get out of control pretty quickly. Maybe that's why you don't see more of it going on on street corners.

An add-on to this last bit would be a theraputic argument technique. Two people could learn to argue constructively by learning to manipulate eachother's vocal chords through hand to body touch-signals. So if one person wanted to say, "you never listen to me," they would have to (having first worked out the conventions with the other person) manipulate the other person body such that the second person would vocalize the phrase, "you never listen to me." The hand-signal conventions and the technique and area of the body for manipulation/contact would be the hardest part to figure out. But the figuring out would itself be theraputic. Probably hand to stomach would work, allowing mutual contact and range of motion. The vocal tract could be mapped onto the stomach -- consanants up and down and vowels side to side -- and presure could be volume, or something like that. The specifics would be better worked out in practice. But the point would be to allow each participant to think out what they were, "saying" and also to get a feel for the other person's point of "view".

JesusHChrist, Sep 01 2005

Kazoo Organ Kazoo_20Organ
"have a resonator more similar to the human larynx," [JesusHChrist, Sep 01 2005]

Paradise Road (1997) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119859/
Glen Close as the conductor of a "vocal orchestra" - not a choir, they just hum - of female inmates of a Japanese internment camp on Sumatra in WWII. (Frances McDormand as a Jewish doctor who will have none of it.) They did use a score, though. Based on historical fact. [jutta, Sep 01 2005]


       This reminds me of the Monty Python sketch involving the 'mouse organ' in which someone hit mice with a hammer to make different pitches of squeaks.   

       I don't really see what the advantage of your idea is over a conventional choir, so I can't vote for it.
discontinuuity, Sep 01 2005

       I've just never seen a conventional choir do this. The idea would be for a new way to use a conventional choir - unless it's already baked.
JesusHChrist, Sep 01 2005

       This is great, we should recruit a choir tout de suite. Replace do, ray, me, fah etc. with various sexual cries (ohhh, aaah, ohmygod, oooh, nnnnh) and play them using various oscene gestures, with eye contact dictating who sings the note...
wagster, Sep 01 2005

       <trivia> For his 'Tarot Suite' album, Mike Batt recorded himself singing (actually more like chanting) each note of a scale onto the corresponding track of an eight-track tape. He then made a loop of the tape and loaded it onto a player which he played by using the faders of an eight-track mixer like the keys of an organ. A DIY Mellotron.
angel, Sep 01 2005

       My mum is in the habit of buying v. upmarket christmas crackers. Last crimbo each cracker contained a penny whistle, each one of which played a different note. The set included a conductor's baton and a variety of melodies written out like this:   

       111.. 111.. 13781.. (jingle bells). One person conducted by pointing at the whistler whose turn it was to play a note.   

       Sounds like what old JHC is talking about 'xept his is for voices. It was extremely good fun. Although that may have been to do with the lateness of the hour and the drunkeness of the participants...
squeak, Sep 02 2005

       That's a wonderful idea, I would like to introduce the inventor to this place.
wagster, Sep 02 2005


back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle