h a l f b a k e r y
Naturally low in facts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
Borrowing from Seagate's Perpendicular
Recording technology for digital storage, I
propose vertical burial as a way to increase
the storage density of cemetaries by a factor
of three. Land use would be maximized and
cemetaries, including those without space for
new applicants, could be reformatted,
providing additional storage capacity and
opportunity for profit.
[MaxwellBuchanan, Feb 21 2007]
Suggested by [veryvermilion] in August 2004
I mentioned at the time that Ben Jonson was buried thusly, in 1637. That would be 'widely known to exist', then. [angel, Feb 22 2007]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
||[+] for using the term "reformatted" with regard to corpses.
||If the coffins were airtight and rifled so the gasses of decomp shot a spinning corpse into the air from time to time, that I would vote for.
||They buried my mother with a post hole digger.
||Some cemetaries are also stacking the bodies in 3's horizontally. It seems like that would still use the same amount of space. If the average casket is 6 feet long and 2 feet tall it would still be a 6x6 area regardless of whether it was horizontal or vertical. My grandmother bought 2 plots for my grandfather and herself. After they were buried we were told that we could have first dibs on the remaining third spot.