h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Why should I use weeks to measure the time I'm dating
somebody, and miliseconds to measure the time between
the
finish of two racing cars? Because 20/60.480.000 th of a week
probably sounds kind of silly to express the difference
between the finishing of those two cars.
But what if there
would be a measurement unit that would
be
as acurate as miliseconds, but also be confortable to use as
it
is with weeks? Maybe logaritmical (I'm not a math wizard so
I'm
not sure)
So it would sound like: "we broke up 1,5 units ago" and also:
"I
finished just -0,2 units before him". The unit should be
usable in both
situations and you don't have to remember how to convert
those unit type of things.
Like I said, I'm not much of a math wizard, so I could be way
off
base here, and it's probably not even practical to use such a
complex unit (then again, I'm still having problems
converting
degrees celcius and farenheit), but it's something that came
up, so I committed it to my favorite bakery. :-)
Maybe one of you guys can shine some light on my idea.
Exponential birthday intervals
http://www.halfbake...irthday_20intervals [hippo, Sep 27 2002, last modified Oct 04 2004]
[link]
|
|
'Maybe one of you guys can shed some light on my idea' |
|
|
No, psneeks is asking for a logarithmic unit of time. Say we set the base as 60 and the zero point as one second, this will give |
|
|
1 second = 0 ulmus
1 minute = 1 ulmu
1 hour = 2 ulmus
1 day = (gets calculator out...) |
|
|
1 day = 2.78 ulmus
1 week = 3.25 ulmus
1 year = 4.22 ulmus
|
|
|
-5 ulmus = 1.29 picoseconds
-4 ulmus = 77.2 picoseconds
-3 ulmus = 4.63 microseconds
-2 ulmus = 278 microseconds
-1 ulmus = 0.0167 seconds (1/60 of a second)
0 ulmus = 1 second
1 ulmu = 1 minute
2 ulmus = 1 hour
3 ulmus = 2.5 days
4 ulmus = 150 days
5 ulmus = nearly 25 years
|
|
|
all, of course completely arbitary and fairly pointless. Cute, though.
(puts calculator away) |
|
|
Hmm... relearning the concept of time.. Nope, not my bag, sorry. |
|
|
Logarithmic units are only really useful when comparing quantities which tend to be logarithmic in meaning. For example, if on a recording a person's voice is 6db louder than the jackhammer in the background, it will remain so regardless of the volume at which the recording is played. |
|
|
A useful place to which this sort of scale might be applied is audio frequencies, with the formula being 12*lg(freq_in_hz/8.1758) [so middle C would be a value of 60 and frequencies would line up with MIDI note numbers. |
|
|
Give me .1693 ulmus to decide if I'll ever utter a public ulmology. |
|
|
[admin] Corrected spelling in title, changed category. |
|
|
Logrithmic units are used for many things already. A few logrithmic units I can think of off of the top of my head: |
|
|
Decibels (sound)
Richter (earthquakes)
Stellar Magnitude (stars)
Storm Magnitude (storms)
pH (Acidity) |
|
|
I'll buy [supercat]'s idea for logarithmic frequency units. I've seen way too many cases where log(f) is more directly useful than f itself. But I'm not sure if the normalization to the MIDI note numbers would be as universally useful as a plain log_2(f) or log_10(f). |
|
|
ulmu.com is available. Cool.. I can't imagine there are many 4-letter domains available... |
|
|
BigBro: I'll grant that lg(f) may be more useful than the MIDI-normalized value (i.e. a difference of one unit per octave); I don't see much use for a log10-based scale, though. Two pitches may be easily heard as being in a 2:1 ratio (or 4:1, or 8:1, or 16:1), much more so than a 10:1. |
|
|
[supercat]: I was thinking more general-pupose signal analysis, not audio necessarily. But on further thought, octaves are still more useful (generally) than decades, so log_2(f) it is. |
|
|
// Two pitches may be easily heard as being in a 2:1 ratio // |
|
|
Not in your typical high school band. :) You'd be hard pressed to find an integer ratio in that mess. |
|
|
If you are doing scientific work, then you already work in seconds. With some very large and very small multipliers. Which are powers of ten, so I think we are already using logarithmic measurement! |
|
|
¯waugsqueke: utus.com (as in arbutus) is available
I also wonder how many four letter domains are available. |
|
| |