h a l f b a k e r yBite me.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
login
|
|
|
Atomic Rocket II
What do you get from a thorium column and a partical accelerator? |
| |
(+1,
-5)
| |
|
|
Jim figures the old thorium alloy column and partical accelerator punch line is a rocket.
To prove the point Jim requires a column of thorium alloy and a particle accelerator (or three). Jim places the metal column on the ground and arranges his particle accelerators in a circle around it, standing
stone style.
Jim fires up the particle accelerators and up goes the column. Jim adjusts the intensity of each accelerator as required.
...
|
| |
Jim might want to note first that the biggest operational component of a particle accelerator is a vacuum. |
|
| |
Jim obligingly trundles out his Dust Devil. |
|
| |
Jim better check the mechanical properties of thorium; building the structural columns of his rocket out of the stuff may not be the best idea... |
|
| |
Nuclear rockets have been proposed. Have a critical geometry of fuel rods like in a boiling water reactor. Heat water to make steam and shoot it out one side of the rocket. a small volume of water turns into a large volume of steam while keeping the fuel cool. |
|
| |
no one wants something "explosive and nuclear" flying above their heads |
|
| |
[metarinka] and [FlyingToaster] where does it say
this is for use on earth? Both objections are
answered by building it on the moon. It's a rather
loony idea. |
|
| |
MaxwellBuchanan has no idea what Jim is talking
about. |
|
| |
15 years later, Jim dies of cancer. |
|
| |
Come one guys, it's not like this is rocket science... |
|
| |
There is not a possible nuclear propulsion scheme
that has not been explored. That includes direct
fusion and fission torches. The next one that works
will be the first, and this is not it. |
|
| |