h a l f b a k e r yYeah, I wish it made more sense too.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
[giggling behind the sofa]
Sssh! I don't think he's seen us yet! |
|
| |
well, it's only a theory... |
|
| |
We don't have this category, because a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention. It's probably quite easy to generate any number of non-plausable, ego-centric theories implicating various external parties as running things behind the scenes for their own ends. Some of those might be entertaining, but I wont hold my breath. |
|
| |
There's no need for the category .... move along,
nothing to see here folks ..... just move along ....
what branch of the Police ? Yes, the Thought Police,
yes, M'am. Nothing to see here ... keep moving ... |
|
| |
There's no substantive evidence of any sort of a conspiracy, or the presence of a mole - which is, of course, just what you'd expect. Highly suspicious .... |
|
| |
//a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention// Several ideas here have 'conspiracy theory' as their central theme, without simply being an example of a conspiracy theory. You could equally well argue that "a car isn't really considered a halfbaked invention". |
|
| |
Today's halfbaked conspiracy theory is tomorrows working
supposition. |
|
| |
Theoretically a halfbaked conspiracy is the same as a full
blown one. |
|
| |
Every conspiracy is halfbaked, at least in theory. |
|
| |
Conspiring to halfbake a theory should be categorically
denied. |
|
| |
Why was this idea supressed and hidden for over nine years? |
|
| |