h a l f b a k e r y
The best idea since raw toast.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
The Earth's magnetic field has been tremendously useful
over the years. A nice aligned field pointing to fixed
at the top and bottom of the globe is very attractive to
navigation enthusiasts. Once Harrison knocked together a
reasonable clock, figuring out where you were was
even in uncivilized regions*.
As it turns out, the magnetic field isn't the reliable old
workhorse we assumed it to be. Instead, it wanders
like it doesn't have a job. Clearly, it needs boundaries.
The magnetic field strength of the Earth is weak. 50
Tesla at the surface. Instead of furiously issuing
navigational corrections, we can simply turn the Earth
an electromagnet. 50 microTesla will need about 100
million Amps, which suggests about 1.5m^2
superconducting cable running a couple of loops around
the equator. Once the current is flowing, we won't need
worry about anything apart from cooling the cable and
barnacle accumulation, probably.
Careful choice of cable orientation will fix the Earth's
magnetic field right through True North where it's
supposed to be. No corrections no messing about.
Solar storm protection and aurora light shows are
delightful features that nations may draw mutual benefit
from, on the understanding that payments are prompt,
sudden discontinuation of the service may cause distress.
*There are many subtle techniques used in navigating
uncivilized regions of the planet. Often these are specific
to the location, which is tricky if you don't know which
location you're in. Some say that location is easily
from a synthesis of environmental cues, but what if you
can't see them because there's a great big French
in the way?
[bs0u0155, Mar 11 2019]
||//1.5m^2 superconducting cable// I thought the point of a
superconducting cable was that it was superconducting? In
which case, why does it need to be so fat? And how would
barnacles adversely affect its performance?
||//why does it need to be so fat?//
||Not my subject, but there's a limit to the current density
||Actually, there might be a cheaper way to do this. A much
thinner non-superconducting wire could be pumped with a
few billion amps. It would vaporise in the blink of an eye, but
the resulting plasma ought to sustain conduction for at least a
few microseconds. During that time, the magnetic field ought
to be sufficient to magnetize any magnetizeable minerals, so
we'd be good to go until tectonics messed it all up again.
||Also, we ought to pilot this scheme on Mars. Giving it a
magnetosphere again ought to mean we can pour some
atmosphere on it, without having it solar-winded away. I
suppose the only downside would be that eventually Mars and
Earth would end up stuck together.
||//tectonics messed it all up again//
||Well, that's something else that needs solving. I'm fine with
India having a long crash into asia, but we have to maintain
standards. Greenwich stays where it is.
||//pilot this scheme on Mars.//
||Smaller and the cooling is almost pre-solved.
||//Greenwich stays where it is.// That's an administrative
matter. When Greenwhich is several thousand miles north-
east of its present location, the North and South poles and all
the longitude lines will just have to be shifted. Of course,
there's always subduction to worry about but, once again, we
can simply redefine all surface features to be mountains.
||Nice, just what humanity needs, a great leap towards the invariable.
||Im currently typing this in Gibraltar, which, it
occurs to me is not a bad place to realign
Greenwich to. In cases of sea level rise, all wed
have to do is move up the rock a bit and displace a
few monkeys. Until then, putting Greenwich 2.0
here in Gib would lend an air of importance (well,
irritation, to the Spanish) in these times of
brexitable dubiousity, such that it would of course
be impossible to move Greenwich 2.0 how could
anyone suggest something so ridiculous.
||Give my regards to Gibraltar, [Ian]. As far as I could tell from
when I was last there, it's basically the UK but in 1977. Mind
you, that was back in 2016.
||Yep, thats about correct. Also, thatd make it
much like Barnes, but 22 years into the future.
||The natural location for the EM north pole would of
course be Warsaw.
||// //Greenwich stays where it is.// That's an administrative matter. //
||Cut round Greenwich. Jack it up and slide some rollers underneath. Then just move it until it has the correct position relative to the pole.
||//Jack it up and slide some rollers underneath. //
||They did it in a crappy movie <link>
||Apparently the books were much better, but not known
outside of Australia, so maybe they didn't think it was worth
it to make a good movie for North American audiences?
||//didn't think it was worth it to make a good movie for
North American audiences?//
||There's plenty of good movies made for the American
audience. I think one reason for the recent downturn in
movie quality is that movies are being made for appeal in
markets outside America. To make movies appeal to S.E.
asia, AND the Indian subcontinent AND Europe/USA, you
have to cut out anything that relies on specific locations,
particular people or events. It's better if there's no dialog,
and sadly, evidence of thought.