h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
G1
Autonomous racing cars | |
Formula 1 is a well promoted series of events in which highly funded teams of engineers,
designers and racing drivers try to outperform one another by building and running their
car round the track in competition with one another.
There are various aspects that spectators can find interesting
or exciting, from
supporting a particular team, or driver, the excitement of witnessing an accident, and
for some, getting involved in the intricacies of the rules and regulations - in these
respects, it's much like any other sport.
I propose a new form of F1, with the following amendments:
1) the drivers are removed from the cars altogether. Since the 80s, safety has improved,
resulting in far fewer driver deaths and serious injuries - this is unarguably a good
thing - but like the abolition of gladiatorial combat, results in a reduction in
excitement for the action-hungry masses
2) The cars are driven autonomously, by computer
3) Uncoupled from the safety aspect, speeds, downforces and other tweakable factors are
increased to maximise speed and excitement
The world is then invited to sit back and spectate, treated with live feeds from the
control rooms, car-cams, car-crash instant replays and in-race interviews with lead
programmers, all surrounded by glossily waxed his-and-her swimwear models, lavishly
overflowing coupes de champagne and all the trappings of ego, excess and celebrity that
we come to expect from top-level sports.
ED Torq - Autonomouse Race Vehicle
http://torq.eddesign.it/#ED_TORQ
On it. [tatterdemalion, Jun 30 2015]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
Nice idea. The spectators should all be AI constructs too, programmed to follow the action and appreciate and discern the different driving qualities of the various autonomous cars. |
|
| |
Why not just implement it all in software? |
|
| |
Yes, [pocmloc] it's natural to go from automated drivers, to a full simulation/software implementation, but I think here we're
trying to construct something that actual, real people might find themselves interested in watching - something physical, with a
sense of danger, risk and excitement - and having big hunks of metal and plastic zooming around a track and flipping out into
messy and explosive clouds of debris might provide at least as much of what is currently provided by the existing F1 spectacle -
only faster, bigger and more punchy than is achievable (ethically) with an integrated human component. I agree taking the human
out of the machine does detract in the peril-stakes, and I suppose this idea assumes a particular set of ethical views that
precludes actual death and peril on the track - death and peril in the control-rooms, private lives and human interactions of the
celebrity participants are of course another matter. |
|
| |
And [hippo] there's certainly a case that there'd be cadre of individuals who'd be interested in watching a set of AI spectators
(TV's "Goggle-Box" provides a precedent - at least in terms of making meta-spectators out of its audience) - though I'm focusing
on the primary spectacle here. |
|
| |
[Ian] yes, a G1 might well consist of a single non-Greek participant, on their own, though it might be unnecessarily redundant to
call it a "G" (I'm assuming the G is anacronymic for "Group") and just have a 1. |
|
| |
//it might be unnecessarily redundant to call it a "G" (I'm assuming the G is anacronymic for "Group") and just have a 1//
If you know it's not a group (and therefore that the 'G' is not needed) you also know that it's just a single participant, so the '1' isn't needed either - the name of this body then becomes "". |
|
| |
//something physical, with a sense of danger, risk
and excitement// But there is no danger involved in
watching robots race. |
|
| |
How about simulated boxing? Or robot trapeze
artists? |
|
| |
High Speed Battlebots. They should have spinning discs of death and such, maybe Mad Max style vehicles without the people. |
|
| |
//Mad Max style vehicles// Ahem. |
|
| |
Ian, yes - we have however just upgraded to an operating system which is still supported by its manufacturer, which feels quite up-to-date and modern. |
|
| |
But if you’re watching it on a screen, does it matter if it is “real world” or simulated, if visually you can’t tell the difference? |
|
| |
This is a stellar idea! There would still be more than a little promise of mayhem involved as fragments of carbot could hurtle into the stands. But the liberation from safety needs for the sake of speed alone makes a lot of sense. For the old timers one could have one or more human piloted cars up against the robots. Robots could come in two classes: piloted and autonomous. For a predictable venue like a race track I think autonomous would really shine. |
|
| |
[pocmloc] That's a very interesting idea. It's probably now possible to render a computer-simulated Formula One race in real-time. |
|
| |