h a l f b a k e r yNormal isn't your first language, is it?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
BorgCo engineers have designed an innovative measuring device.
Given the availability of cheap laser rangefinders, a handheld unit has been produced that allows measurement of a linear distance by non-contact methods.
The device resembles a handheld barcode scanner. A red laser beam is emitted
from the slot, although this is merely for guidance; the actual measurement is carried out by a pulsed infrared laser.
The beam is projected onto the surface to be measured. By manipulating the trigger on the device, the width scanned can be widened or narrowed. When the centre of the trigger is pulled, the unit registers the positions of the two extremities of the line and then by simple 3D geometry calculates the linear distance between them, which is then displayed on an LCD panel.
Any "clutter" between the ends of the guide line is ignored; the unit is only interested in the two end points.
Useful for measuring things not easily reachable; the spacing between brackets on house guttering, the distance between fence posts without struggling to pass a tape over intervening herbage, or the span between two tree branches to allow Christmas lights to be deployed in the most efficient way without resorting to a ladder and trial-and error.
"Who hung the monkey ?"
https://en.wikipedi...nimal_trial#Monkeys
British justice at its finest. [8th of 7, Dec 10 2019]
[link]
|
| |
Hmm. I'm thinking that handheld wobble is going to be the
main issue here. As I understand it, you first aim it and
adjust it until the two spots are aimed at the two targets
you want to measure. This alone will be tricky, because
you'll be looking at one target whilst trying to keep the spot
still on the other one. But then you've also got to pull the
trigger whilst holding the same aim - clearly doable, but
perhaps not easy if you're not a gunslinger. |
|
| |
This could work if the device were held in some sort of
fixed stand. |
|
| |
Or (and here's a thought), how about a digital camera that
indcludes a rapidly-scanning IR laser rangefinder. That would
enable you to take a photo of a scene, and assign each image
pixel a distance (from the camera). Then just click on any
two points on the image, and software will tell you the
distance between them. |
|
| |
[+] easily bakeable. Two cheap rangefinders on a digital protractor. Angular resolution might be a problem depending on the distance you're expecting to use this with. |
|
| |
// handheld wobble is going to be the main issue here // |
|
| |
<Sigh> Like we said, take more water with it. Or in Sturton's case, a bit less ... well, let's not go there. |
|
| |
No, it's a line, with two (2) ends. |
|
| |
// not easy if you're not a gunslinger. // |
|
| |
We fail to comprehend the problem there. |
|
| |
//some sort of fixed stand // |
|
| |
There's a threaded bush in the bottom of the grip so you can mount it to a standard photographic tripod. Or you could lean on something, a concept with which you appear to be rather familiar. |
|
| |
// camera that indcludes a rapidly-scanning IR laser rangefinder // |
|
| |
Good, but complicated; however, useful for postmission image analysis. |
|
| |
// how accurate you want it to be // |
|
| |
You get what you pay for. |
|
| |
// optical range finders and “tape measure” analogues are available at most hardware stores. // |
|
| |
They're all 1-D devices; this works in 3-D. |
|
| |
// Two cheap rangefinders on a digital protractor. // |
|
| |
Yes, but ours has it all in the one convenient package. |
|
| |
// Leica Disto [link] - good enough? // |
|
| |
No, because after you've bought one, you're then lacking an arm and a leg, which makes it difficult to use. |
|
| |
We're talking about a consumer grade device for under USD $50. |
|
| |
The same goes for handheld lidar. Oddly, not seen one of those on offer at a Wal-Mart ... |
|
| |
It doesn't do anything like what's suggested. The Disto 1 is a 1-D linear measure. It measures the distance from its own position to another position within its range. |
|
| |
Our device measures the distance between two positions, both at a distance from the device, by triangulation and 3-D geometry. You can do the same thing with a linear measure and (as [mit] suggests) a digital protractor - but it's hardly point-and-shoot. You could probably write an app to do the geometry for you, tho. |
|
| |
//indirect measurement by Pythagoras method// To do that,
it must have some kind of angular sensor, which is what I was
going to suggest. |
|
| |
The problem with the accelerometers in that device is drift between shots. No matter how careful you are with trying to maintain the position of the device between the two shots, the accuracy is awful (yes, we've used one) even on a tripod. |
|
| |
Our device is a "one click" system with no need for the error and drift prone accelerometers. |
|
| |
// //indirect measurement by Pythagoras method// To do
that, it must have some kind of angular sensor, which is what I
was going to suggest. // |
|
| |
No. You must be thinking of the cosine law. The Pythagorean
theorem assumes a right triangle. I just pulled out my Bosch
GLM 35 and used it in this mode, and it worked fine. It doesn't
measure any angle. The only limitation is that you have to be
on a line that passes perpendicularly through the line you wish
to measure at one of its endpoints, so as to form a right
triangle between its two endpoints and the measuring device. |
|
| |
// you have to be on a line that passes perpendicularly through the line you wish to measure at one of its endpoints // |
|
| |
That's exactly the irritating limitation that our design is intended to overcome. You don't need a right angle anywhere; knowing a, b and theta for any triangle, c can be calculated irrespective of orientation. |
|
| |
Or, you could just continue to use a trained monkey, equipped with a tape measure! - (otherwise that's you out of another job 8th) |
|
| |
Well, if you have plenty of time to do the training you could always hire a french carbon unit and train them up; they are plentiful, and cheaper than monkeys because monkeys learn faster, smell better, and are easy to housetrain. |
|
| |
It's hard to understand how the people of Hartleypool made such a sad mistake; it must have been an exceptionally ugly, stupid monkey. <link> |
|
| |
Yes, but we don't want it now, or in a month - we want it three days ago, so that the "No, they won't reach between those two branches" argument can be resolved without scrambling up ladders in the wind, rain and gathering datkness. |
|
| |
// many have ToF sensors on the front (for facial recognition) // |
|
| |
Not being a phone user at the moment, the only one I have specific
knowledge of is the iPhone X, and I was under the impression that
that one used coded light, like the first-generation Kinect (not to be
confused with the second-generation Kinect, which uses time of
flight). |
|
| |
Speaking of time-of-flight cameras, how do they do in full sunlight
these days? How about in full sunlight on Mars? |
|
| |
[Chairborne Hero] my Wacom computer has (some form of)
3D scanning built-in, but I haven't managed to get it to work
yet :-( |
|
| |
TIL Wacom makes drawing tablets with built-in computers now. |
|
| |