h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
As we know, computerized random number generators are not so random. Generally, they use the current time (down to milliseconds) as a seed to generate a number.
Nature can be very unpredicable. Even in this age, weather prediction isn't all that great.
A small computer hooked up to a few barometers,
thermometers, psychrometers, and anemometers, using them for input as seed would yield a truly random number.
We could even use sphygmometers, but we need a volunteer.
Good idea but baked
http://www.lavarnd.org/
[theircompetitor, Mar 21 2006]
[link]
|
| |
Baked in a sense by the lava link, though I suppose you could claim that what you're doing is slightly different |
|
| |
Using nature to provide random numbers is Half Baked, too - every other idea in this category is along those lines. But I don't think the things you're measuring are sufficiently random. |
|
| |
I like the idea. It's time Mother Nature started paying her way, she's had it easy the last few millennia. |
|
| |
A related concept (I thought of it second): Blow soap bubbles in the wind and derive a number based on their relative position over time. I like soap bubbles. |
|
| |