h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
It is possible, by shining a light on a surface and watching the return, to see how noisy it is. (if it's a hard surface you can listen, but this idea doesn't need that level of fidelity)
This laser system would shine an array of lasers onto the ground and detect vibrations. A computer would filter
out universal ones and parse the vibrations to draw vectors to the origins and detect what some of those origins are. Short-term vibrations, such as from an explosion, could be filtered out or recognized by recognizing their short-termidness. Universal vibrations (such as from the wind) could be filtered out by recognizing their universality. A great deal of calculus would then process the remaining ones. It's unlikely to be sensitive enough to detect a foot-fall, but an artillery or machine gun emplacement repeatedly firing would easily be detectable, as would a moving tank or truck. Until now this hasn't been possible simply due to the noise of battle involving so many wave-forms. But modern GPUs are up to the task.
edit: Not necessarily aircraft-borne.
[link]
|
|
This doesn't look like it will be very squaddie-proof .... |
|
|
Besides, simple acoustic transducers will do exactly the same thing without recourse to lasers. |
|
|
But the problem is the noise floor; so much random, local noise that more distant sources can't be discriminated. A little research on the problems of seismometry will disclose most of the issues. |
|
|
Why? What size is your mom? %-) |
|
|
Even if you could get this to work, it could be easily
defeated by some pretty simple random vibration
shaker tables, off-balance engines, etc. |
|
| |