h a l f b a k e r y
Naturally low in facts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
The success of prepaid phone cards
has inspired a rash of related business
ideas. One I see in my local supermarket
is gift cards for local chain stores.
Prepaid cell phone service is hawked
on the TV airwaves, at least around here.
Clearly prepaid is the way to go for
so many of today's
It has so many advantages. The seller
doesn't have to worry about getting paid,
the buyer never gets an unexpected bill,
and there's no question about how much
stuff to use: the buyer uses until he uses
up the amount on the card.
Why not extend this idea to war?
For instance, take the proposed Iraq war.
There's been much talk about how much
it will cost, with varying estimates based
on various scenarios, much of which
depends on policy. Well, why not use the
prepaid card to answer all that: you have
war until the card is used up, and that's
the policy, the scenario, and the transaction.
Another advantage: some feel that taxes
to pay for war is unfair because everyone
has to pay, including people who didn't
want the war. With the prepaid war card,
only those who want war pay. Then they
have as much war as they've purchased.
If you want a lot of war, charge up the
card a lot.
Plus of course no bickering later about
And no bickering now about whether to
have the war, or how much to have.
If we don't have enough people who are
willing to prepay enough for a decent sized
war, then it's simple; you don't have one.
That's how it works with prepaid cards
of all sorts. No one makes you have
that phone service. If you want it, you
pay for it. In advance.
||I suppose you would have a picture of a white dove on these...collect them all.Baaaah !
||I need to see some ID with that.
||"Maverick, Maverick ! We have a tone - Fox One ! Fox OnBIP BIP BIP 'You have used your available credit. Please insert four hundred and fifty-six thousand, eight hundred and nine dollars and fifty cents for your next heat-seeking air to air missile, or enter your chargecard number at the tone. BEEP.'"
||/some feel that taxes to pay for war is unfair because everyone has to pay, including people who didn't want the war/
Perhaps it is also unfair that everyone in this country enjoys freedom, including those who have no appreciation of it's value or the responsibilities that come with it?
This goes much deeper than the issue of war. I am not a senior citizen, nor a handicapped person, nor an abused child, nor unemployed, but I pay taxes to support programs which benefit them all. I also pay taxes which enable medical treatment for illegal aliens who cross our borders seeking treatment with no intention of ever paying. My tax dollars also go in the volumes of millions and billions of dollars in aid to virtually any country you can name or even pronounce, with little if any hope of ever being repaid. The list of things my tax dollars do is virtually endless, and very few of those things actually benefit *me* directly.
Do I *select* not to participate?
Selective participation is NOT an option when considering the welfare of a country as a whole.
I am not saying that I support *any* proposed war with *any* other country, but like it or not, we as a country have elected people to act on our behalf, and hopefully in our best interests regarding matters such as war. Regrets? Your vote was as powerful as any other, assuming that you *chose to participate* in that process. The system is obviously not perfect, but it remains one of the longest-standing democracies on the books, which has in it's history several wars... some of which were fought for freedom, some for principle, and some, unfortunately, for misguided righteousness.
Perhaps you should start working on the model for the perfect government that *you* will enact when you have a country of your own to run, where there are no bad guys, and every tree gets a great big hug every day.
By the way, I regret that I have but one fishbone to give for this idea.
||X2Entendre: Unless you're from Iceland, your claim to having the longest-standing democracy isn't true, since they've had a functioning parliament since 930.
||930 ? That's only just after breakfast .....
||[Farmer John], though not a shining example by any means, you are correct that Iceland's so-called democracy (even though it has been known to act against the wishes of a good 95% of it's population at times) *is* older than that of the U.S. Many would question whether Iceland has a true democracy, but I've amended my annotation, nonetheless. Thank you for pointing out this technicality.
||War Bonds are investments.
The government promises to
pay you back more than you invested.
||Prepaid cards are expenses.
You get nothing back.
||/Perhaps it is also unfair that everyone in this country enjoys freedom/
||Of course. Just as it's unfair
that everyone in this country
pays taxes to prop up third
world dictators. Prepaid war
card is just a payment option
that offers selectivity.
||Every war must have clearly designed goals and an exit strategy. Unless of course you are planning to just lob a few cruise missiles.
||Just "running out of money" in the middle of a complicated mission like Iraq would be stupid.
||Quite correct Madai, but it would at least stop politicians from saying they could overthrow some foreign government for $50bn when they knew perfectly well they couldn't.
||You would have to make this a constitutional amendment for it to work in the US. Otherwise, the legislature would just pass a law allocating X dollars for whatever war they choose.
||Also, this would not have prevented the 2003 Iraq war for another reason: We never made peace with Iraq back in '91.
||Even if we assume this idea is well-meaning, it's still impractical. I'm not against pre-funding wars, but this particular idea is flawed.