h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Perhaps rather then being able to accurately tell the time to the second what's required is a reminder that the seconds are passing. Introducing the ChronosT (TM).
The watch comes in a variety of styles and colours. The point of similarity between them all is that they have no hands or numbers,
merely a flat panel. Whether worn on the wrist, as a pendant, or a fob, the watch produces a slightly enhanced ticking as a reminder that life is passing and that many of us believe we're only gonna get one spin.
Variations to the ChronosT might include a watch with a ranging tick loudness, or one that gives a single loud "tick" at unplanned intervals.
[link]
|
| |
why not just take away the hour and minute hands and have a rotating bezel ?
you could always just count ? |
|
| |
Thanks for the comment neilp - I think I'd better send the first ChronosT to you. |
|
| |
probably just a personal thing [Non] - I'm more a sweeper than a ticker when it comes to watches. |
|
| |
Could I get a digital one? The ticking on analogue timepieces drives me crazy. |
|
| |
[yamahito] me too - I bought a new watch a couple of weeks back, and (because the shop was quite loud) I didn't notice the ticking noise.. It's fine to wear in public places, but I have to put it in my pocket at the cinema, and in a different room if I want to get to sleep. |
|
| |
A digital version might have an LCD display that shows a pulse of coloured ripples each second... or possibly in time with your heartbeat. |
|
| |
I like the thought of a sweeper and ticker version -- all you get is one second at a time. |
|
| |
I really like this post. It's very existential. Inspired! |
|
| |