h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
How about arrows with RFID tags designed to take
power from a hand-held radio beam, and chirp (either
audibly or in RF or maybe even both)? |
|
|
I agree - radio-trackable arrows would make a lot
more sense. |
|
|
However, a [+] for combining two beautiful and
under-used words in the title. |
|
|
While I agree that radio tracking would be more effective, that seems somewhat counter to the old-technology charm of bow hunting. Then again, a lot of the bows used for hunting aren't really old-technology either. |
|
|
I dunno, [scad]. I reckon electromagnetic waves
were around before coloured smoke. |
|
|
The easiest solution would be to make the arrowhead from depleted uranium. Not only would this poison the wound but you could potentially triangulate with a geiger counter. |
|
|
a small flashing IR led might be useful here. |
|
|
Radio-trackable arrows are baked. As far as I know there
aren't any off-the-shelf models available, but bowhunting
catalogs sell DIY kits with RFID inserts that go inside the
shaft. You can also get nocks with flashing LED beacons
that activate on release. |
|
|
I like this idea better. [+] |
|
|
// You can also get nocks with flashing LED beacons
that activate on release// But IR leds would be
visible on a cheap and nasty camera, and the deer
would be oblivious, unless deer can see IR? I have no
eye deer. |
|
|
Deer can't see IR. Their visible spectrum is surprisingly
limited, but it's a trade-off for great night vision, incredible
motion sensitivity, and a 280-degree field of view. |
|
| |