h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
A Halfbakery fork with all the same categories, but where
people of meagre imagination, wit and/or writing experience can post their ideas without fear of virtual
smirking, sighing, eye-rolling or tongue-clicking.
EZBakery
[xaviergisz, Apr 12 2016]
Happy Cuddle Bakery
[xaviergisz, Apr 12 2016]
[link]
|
|
'Inventions are best if they're possible, or impossible in interesting ways." |
|
|
This idea fails on both criteria. |
|
|
' Obvious contradictions meant as a joke - e.g., "dehydrated water" - grow old quickly," |
|
|
... as would // where people of meagre imagination, wit and/or writing experience can post their ideas without fear of virtual smirking, sighing, eye-rolling or tongue-clicking. // |
|
|
Wake up and smell the feathers and hot tar.... |
|
|
<smirks; sighs; rolls eye and clicks tongue> |
|
|
"What spelling!" is my favourite annotation (to EZBakery) and I think it should be used more often. |
|
|
So... you want an easy bake coven? |
|
|
"We have found a witch, may we burn her ?" |
|
|
The Halfbakery Lite (sic) has already been around for a while now..... what's that clicking sound? |
|
|
<grammatical pedantry>[8th], I think you mean "We have found a witch; may we burn her?"</gp> |
|
|
Actually, it's probably of greater correctness to say: "I think that which you mean is...." |
|
|
Of course we're all meaning in the right direction. |
|
|
Turns out that wich is a word. So; Which Wich witch witch which Wich witch? is grammatically correct. |
|
|
only where buffalo are concerned. |
|
| |