h a l f b a k e r y
We are investigating the problem and will update you shortly.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
High speed rail has revolutionised intercity travel, but it remains an expensive form of transport. Buses are a cheaper alternative but take forever.
To fill that intermediate gap in the market, I suggest high speed bus. The vehicle is essentially a stretch limo except it's also stretched sideways
to accommodate a 4 abreast seating arrangement, like on conventional buses. But because it is as low as a car and has a more powerful engine it is capable of cruising at a speed of 160 km/h (100 mph). It has a door next to each seat row to allow the 40 passengers to board sideways, and luggage is stored in a oversized trunk in the back.
Compared to normal buses which travel at a speed of 100 km/h (65 mph), this bus will achieve a time saving of 30-40%, while still costing less than rail travel. For example, the journey time from London to Manchester could be reduced from 4:30 to 2:45, which is almost as fast as the train and much faster than flying.
In countries where there is a speed limit on motorways the bus would be piloted by a driver trained to high standards, making an exemption possible.
||+ for cool visual, at least.