h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
|
[+] but if you've got a point source, which you need in order to add the gelling agent, why not just pump it into a tank ? |
|
|
I would guess, because no tank(s) big enough are readily
available. Damn logistics. |
|
|
This is an outstandingly cunning idea! You'd need a fairly
stable gel, though. |
|
|
One other thought - would it not have been possible to
pump the waste out into a tanker? |
|
|
One final thought - it probably doesn't matter, except for
psychological reasons. I doubt that that amount of waste,
dispersed by a few days of currents, would be detectable.
But maybe I'm wrong. |
|
|
[MB] so far it's resulting in radioactive fish. |
|
|
I suggest agar. That's coming from almost zero expertise. |
|
|
Hmm. Agar. Let's see... moderately expensive - check.
Sufficiently fragile to be broken easily by wave action -
check. A nutritious snack for turtles and fish - check. Yep -
ticks all the boxes. |
|
|
Hey wait -- that's the form to have me committed. |
|
|
How about "Committed thinkers." as a tagline? |
|
|
ask and you shall recieve: marked-for-tagline |
|
|
Dope the gelling agent with boron, xenon or some such neutron absorber. Not affiliated with Pampers, Depends, or anything with added wings... |
|
|
Sodium Silicate, maybe? They've already got some on-site from when they plugged the crack in that cable trench. |
|
| |