Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
We are investigating the problem and will update you shortly.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.



Rotary Dial Water Water Timer

A water-powered sprinkler timer
(+2, -2)
  [vote for,

Akin to a light timer with a rotary dial and white or black pegs that are placed at the desired ON/OFF times.

Perhaps with a 48 or 96 hour dial for less frequent watering.

Garden hose in & out, allows full flow in ON mode, with a tiny dribble in OFF mode to power the dial.

afinehowdoyoudo, May 27 2007

Light timer http://www.planetna...ow-light-timer.html
similar to this [afinehowdoyoudo, May 27 2007]

someone is working on it http://www.freepate...ne.com/5782578.html
[xandram, May 27 2007]

Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL. E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)

       [marked-for-deletion] redundant with the 555 idea you linked to. I really don't see the difference.
ldischler, May 27 2007

       [ldischler], admittedly this rotary dial timer and the 555 have very similar range of applications. However, this one is self-contained, simple to use, and has a fixed timing cycle. The 555 requires external circuitry and is completely variable.
afinehowdoyoudo, May 27 2007

       If you have minor improvements like that, you should annotate the original idea, not add a new one.
ldischler, May 27 2007

       its not better or worse, its a different device
afinehowdoyoudo, May 29 2007

       The difference (and the reason I'm ignoring ldischler's mfd, but just barely) is that the 555 is a whole hydraulic construct, while this one is just water-powered. So, *this* one I could build by sticking a conventional timer on top of a little wheel - whereas the 555 would be interesting to look at, but would probably take up a pretty big vat and be interesting only as a novelty or teaching toy.
jutta, Jun 06 2007

       thanks [jutta]. Renamed in the hope of distinguishing it from the 555. If I had to choose between the 2, I would keep this one - it's a practical gadget, unlike the complicated 555.
afinehowdoyoudo, Jun 10 2007

       somebody suggested avoiding the OFF-mode 'dribble' by storing energy from ON-mode flow to run the timer during OFF-mode.
afinehowdoyoudo, Jun 18 2007

       You'll have some challenges here. Flowrate and pressure are interdependent, and neither will ever really be constant in an application like this. Error could easily be in the 25% range or higher. Your mechanism that is powered by the water will be rather sensitive to one or both of these properties <that is if it is truly "water-powered", you could easily make it water-energised, spring-powered or similar. Otherwise you could easily make a system you set for a given volume ie 100 litres, or whatever, this is much easier than a fickle timer>   

       I think I know how to do this accurately, though. It involves a header tank and a float valve, to supply a constant head pressure for the sensitive timer mechanism.   

       -eh, I think about these things too much
Custardguts, Jun 20 2007


back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle