Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Not the Happy Cuddle Club.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                   

Self-recharging hearing aid

Use inaudible or irrelevant sounds to recharge a hearing aid
  (+2)
(+2)
  [vote for,
against]

There are a lot of ideas on here about harvesting tiny bits of spare energy with the snag of the energy not being enough to achieve very much. I don't consider this idea to fall into that category.

Psychoacoustic compression filters out most audio data without intrusive compression artifacts. Most of these are probably irrelevant to the energy question, but not all. For a start, there must be a lot of ultrasonic and infrasonic sound which currently serves no purpose at all but could be detected by a microphone, and the likes of a quiet noise just before a louder one or masked by a louder one can safely be removed from a recording without listeners noticing. Moreover, noises at night, such as traffic, ticking alarm clocks, snoring, central heating boilers and fridges turning on and off and so forth, are if anything a nuisance to people with good hearing. For a hearing aid, sitting unused by the bedside, they are also wasted energy.

Therefore, why not use the energy of these sounds to recharge the hearing aid? Store them in a capacitor, maybe, and release that into the battery when it runs low. No more need to change batteries as often.

Oh, and the reason why i think it's more practical for this device than others is that a hearing aid needn't use much power.

nineteenthly, Oct 28 2011

Hearing aid power consumption http://www.maxim-ic...s/index.mvp/id/4691
"1-10 mW" [csea, Oct 28 2011]

Sound Power http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_power
Sound power vs SPL [csea, Oct 28 2011]

Piezo powered. http://www.noliac.c...efault.aspx?ID=5091
No mention of using sound or not. [2 fries shy of a happy meal, Oct 28 2011]

[link]






       Hmm, let's look at a few back-of-the envelope numbers.   

       From a chip manufacturer, we see that hearing aids typically consume 1-10 mW of power. [link1] And the sound power of various sources seems also in that range (including "vivid children!"). [link2]   

       The difficulty lies in the dispersal of that power over volumetric distance and the surface area of a collector used to capture the power. At 1 meter distance from "vivid children," the 1mW of power is distributed over 4(pi)R^2 meters, or about 12 square meters. If we hope to capture energy with a small diaphragm, say a 1 cm square, the most we could hope for is 1/1200 of a mW, or 833nW (nanowatts.) Rounding up to a microwatt, we're still shy by a factor of 1000 to 10,000.
csea, Oct 28 2011
  

       The clear answer is 5000 vivid children slaves driven to louder wailing by whips, so you can just turn the hearing aid off altogether.
RayfordSteele, Oct 28 2011
  

       I did have a thought about including an ear trumpet. Then you could throw away the hearing aid altogether.
nineteenthly, Oct 28 2011
  

       How about a tiny dynamo rigged to a self-winding watch mechanism?
Alterother, Oct 28 2011
  

       How about one of those kinetic battery chargers? It would need to be quite small, and would need quite vigorous head movements. But it would be a self solving problem - if the batteries go flat, the wearer will forever be turning their head to point an ear at the speaker, thereby assisting the recharging process.   

       Alternatively, a special recharging platform could be sold with the hearing aid, on which the behearingaided person would stand and be shaken until the batteries were charged.
MaxwellBuchanan, Oct 28 2011
  

       //I did have a thought about including an ear trumpet. Then you could throw away the hearing aid altogether.//   

       Ear trumpets are bulky and ugly, but I have a solution for a sob-population of hearing-aid wearers, namely those unfortunate souls who have also lost an eye. Given that the eye socket is now vacant real-estate in the head, an integral ear-trumpet could be fashioned. I suspect that the surgery needed to bring the distal end of the trumpet into close proximity with the inner ear would be relatively trivial.
MaxwellBuchanan, Oct 28 2011
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle