Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
If you need to ask, you can't afford it.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


         

Unobtanium fission rocket

If only we had a good (fast, efficient) neutron reflector...
  (+3)
(+3)
  [vote for,
against]

Bear with me.

Premise – we discover a material that’s a good reflector of neutrons. In the “mirrors are a good reflector of light” sense, not low-efficiency, slow scattering reflection you get from existing reflectors.

Two reasons. First - it would mean that critical mass wasn't so important anymore. In theory, if you could make a sphere that was a perfect internal neutron reflector, ANY suitable fissile (gives off as many or more neutrons under decay, as it takes to trigger the decay - this I know isn't the textbook definition of fissile, but what I need for this concept) mass placed inside (that underwent even slow, natural neutron-emitting decay) would fairly rapidly undergo complete fission, once it’s neutrons started coming back in force. The closer it was to the original critical mass, the quicker it'd go off. Of course in application I'm certain there'd be limitations with structural integrity, etc – it probably wouldn’t work for bombs, I mean.

...Anyhoo, getting to the point. Make a rocket with a reaction chamber that’s internally reflective for neutrons, ported at the exhaust. Work out all your reaction curves beforehand….

Now throttle the rocket by putting some suitably fissile material into the reaction chamber, and based on the ratios of exhaust port size, fissile mass, reactivity, and chamber size – you’ll get a controllable, throttle-able nuclear rocket. Yes, with the fissile mass as the reaction mass…

Obvious improvements would be shaping the reaction chamber for progressive reaction, boosting with fusion-able fuel, and perhaps not building it in the first place. If we did find a suitable neutron reflector, I’m sure we’d come up with better uses, like for more efficient reactors, or probably just better bombs – the rocket idea was just the first to come to me.

Originally intended as an anno to [madness]’s atomic rocket idea. I just didn’t want to write the above from Jim’s perspective. I think Jim is a weirdo.

[words to the effect that I don’t think this is even a very original idea. I just can’t find it fleshed out anywhere convenient. It’s got parallels with other nuclear propulsion concepts, at the least]

Custardguts, Mar 05 2010

Wkipedia: Demon Core http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core
One experiment involving this core involved the use of tungsten-carbide neutron reflectors to convert a sub-critical mass into a critical one, in another, beryllium was used. [zen_tom, Mar 05 2010]

Fission-fragment rocket https://en.wikipedi...ion-fragment_rocket
What this is a type of. It's most similar to the dusty plasma bed reactor type Wikipedia describes. [notexactly, Oct 24 2016]

[link]






       This should work to some degree, even without a perfect reflector, and is certainly better without Jim's POV.   

       Fast neutrons of 1 MeV have a speed of 14,000 km/s, which compares favorably with the 50 km/s of an ion drive, and the 1 km/s exhaust of a solid rocket.
ldischler, Mar 05 2010
  

       A wall of neutrons might fit the bill. The problem being bootstrapping.   

       There might be some specialised conditions 'out there' that forms a deep rich vein that can be mined.
wjt, Oct 26 2016
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle