h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Walk into a bar and pay as you travel closer and closer to the livest screen. Ahhhhh.... you spent well tonight, the beer-drinking, rubble-rumbling fan of whatever it is of which you are a fan.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
...there might even be one monitor that shows extrapolations of the live footage, allowing a glimpse into the one- or two-frame future... |
|
| |
But if you stand further away from the screen, you already see the action later than someone next to the screen. |
|
| |
I've been in a pub before watching football in which one screen was
from a digital signal and the other from an analogue one. This resulted
in a 10 second lapse, facilitating instantaneous viewer-defined action
replay via the rotation of a few degrees of one's head, dependent on
your position in the establishment. |
|
| |
Ah, well, my favorite channel is the History Channel anyway. Does this mean my beer would be free? |
|
| |
Hmm, this is actually possible and quite a decent idea. Just need an internet-capable TV with a radio-controlled clock. We could brand it Simulcast. |
|
| |
1) Use the local time signal transmitter
2) Digital broadcast encodes a desired transmission time.
3) Buffer the stream until it is time to broadcast |
|
| |
Now for a SimulDrink to go with it... |
|
| |
If you live your life slowly enough (think "giant tortoise" or "Joshua Tree"), the BBC and Dave do this quite well. |
|
| |