h a l f b a k e r yReformatted to fit your screen.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Every camera-based motion detection system I've used or
are aware of detects motion using a simple algorithm of
counting the changed pixels. And every one that I know of
suffers the same problem, which is false positives caused
when the sun moves in and out of clouds. Although there
are a
few tweaks applied to minimise this, it's still a big
issue. What I've noticed is that the pixel comparison is a
trivial one based on either RGB pixel values or intensity. A
better algorithm would be to bias the value of the change
per pixel by hue more than by intensity. So a person or
animal walking over a surface changes the colour (hue) but
a change in sunlight only changes the intensity. This would
be a very minor tweak to a program such as 'motion' or
'zoneminder' but would greatly reduce the false positive
rate.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |