h a l f b a k e r yThere's no money in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Commercial stun-guns are modified and hidden in ordinary objects, as counter-measure to unlawful search and seizure.
Positive points: a) possible using off-the-shelf components
Negative points: a) battery life/maintenance issues. b) likely to cause much concern if scanned c) backfire and collateral
damage issues d) unusual approach invites similarly creative response from careerist prosecutors.
[link]
|
| |
We could have great fun taking only the positive points and negative points, and coming up with new inventions that they could apply to. |
|
| |
Agreed. Using unusual off-the-shelf components is
likely to backfire and invite a seizure response in
careerist prosecutors. |
|
| |
Google is not your friend. [marked-for-deletion] cellphone tasers are commercially available: widely known to exist. |
|
| |
One of the nice things about the Halfbakery is that underscores_are_not_needed. |
|
| |
I don't get how this is an "improvized device;" it seems
more like a disguised device. Disguised weapons are illegal
almost everywhere, making your "unlawful search and
seizure" (wtf?) a very legal S & S. Making or carrying one is
just begging to get arrested. |
|
| |
Would these objects be hidden on ones person? Or within the belongings? I have devised a similar system for my belongings, protecting them from unlawful search by storing them in a tottering and precarious pile with old beverage containers on top, and the possibility of roaches leaping out and getting down those unlawful shirts and trousers. |
|
| |
Just a "possibility", mom! |
|
| |