h a l f b a k e r yMagical moments of mediocrity.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I read a thing at a general medical practice magazine that vaccines have variable efficacy with different length syringe tips 2.5 cm being more effective than 1.6 cm on measured rates of immunity
Thinking on the nature of a pimple the pooled region is unavailable to immune response as a result of
pressure as well as geometry
a really effective syringe tip would be multiport or leaky at a few dozen sites from 1 to 2 cm to create a vaccine fluid surface area with more capillary contact to foster immune response
notably vaccine adjuvants are things like absorption minerals or mineral oil that are thought to create a gradualized release or physical area-durable response I think these adjuvants could be adjusted to work well with a multiport syringe tip
during the 1980s it was published that rubella killed a tenth of all of one continent's children Thus it appears that cheaper vaccine as well as more responsive vaccine is of value
tattoo a vaccine show prommiss for dna
http://www.scienced...02/080206203106.htm
. [Sir_Misspeller, Jan 15 2009]
[link]
|
| |
yahbut... wouldn't all the different depths simple pool themselves together ? |
|
| |
friction would make it hard to insert |
|
| |
I think you mean needle tip, not syringe tip. You want to spread the stuff out. Multiple fenestrations on a needle would not be a big deal to make. I would like to read the data showing differing efficacy with differing tip length. |
|
| |
I'm going at finding a [link] It was an article from a magazine out of a general practicioners office |
|
| |
Would it work to just use separate syringes? |
|
| |
My annotations here keep getting deleted for no obvious
reason. |
|
| |
Anyway, why not train doctors to inject at the optimal depth
with a regular needle, or to draw the needle out as they
inject to distibute the vaccine? |
|
| |
// My annotations here keep getting deleted for no obvious reason. |
|
| |
I'm not seeing your annotations come through in the input log, so that problem is a technical one between you and the site, not a social one. |
|
| |
I thought needles were a thing of the past for vaccinations - aren't transdermal/intercutaneous jets and/or mucosal sprays in common use? |
|
| |
// problem is a technical one between you and the site// |
|
| |
Ah - curiouser and curiouser, but thanks - I'll quell my
paranoia. The first annotation was to say that this was a
surprisingly understandable idea for Beany, and had earned
my [+] (which I now restore). The second was to point out
that my first annotation had vanished. |
|
| |