h a l f b a k e r y
Futility is persistent.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
I note that the estimated cost of the Orion mission to
Alpha Centauri, adjusted for inflation, amounts to around
two trillion dollars, which is the approximate GDP for Italy
or India. There is an interesting contrast between the
populations of those countries based presumably on their
of living. Meanwhile, India has just launched
something like a hundred satellites into space with one
rocket and might be sending a probe to Venus. It's
supposed to be the country of choice for space launches
because it's so cheap.
There are certain parts of the world with fantastic
mineral resources which, however, are for that very reason
horrible places to live, with corruption, political instability
and terrible working conditions for their citizens with
enormous discrepancies in distribution of wealth.
However, there is also the ocean and manganese nodules,
sea water with useful elements and the like.
My suggestion is this: cause to form or construct a new
island out in international waters somewhere on the
equator. Divert funding from all space programmes in all
nations with them to this island. Create open borders for
anyone who wishes to work there and incentivise people
with the more relevant skills. Once there, minimise
economic activity other than that required to research,
build and launch starships, probably space arks, and space
habitats within this solar system, and locate possible
habitable planets. Allow any new ideas or technological
fallout to be used royalty-free by the rest of the world.
Also, allow anyone, from any nation, free access to the
country if their income is below a certain level, up to a
certain population, in return for working on the projects.
I'm sure this would never work and that you're about to
point out why.
jfk We choose to
go to the moon. Time for a update? [popbottle, Feb 17 2017]
||// Divert funding from all space programmes in all nations
||An opposite of "duplication of effort" is "putting all your
eggs in one basket". Neither is a good idea in the long run.
And now that I've noted that, I'm completely unsure of
what is the actual best way to go about it.
||Okay, I have to admit the second paragraph doesn't quite follow from
the first. What if I take out the diversion of funding?
||then you're proposing a different way to spend our space dollars that shoehorns in your beliefs about immigration and politics, which would ultimately cost a lot more due to the price of shipping if nothing else. The same technological mecca could be built in literally any Western society for a lot less, even factoring in the extra launch weight you would get at the equator. Buying part of Colombia would also cost less substituting security spending for launch weight spending.
||Building vehicles on your planet's surface and then hauling them up and out of its gravity well is incredibly expensive and inefficient.
||You've got a nearby satellite with low gravity, abundant solar energy, no worries about biosphere pollution, untapped mineral resources, and a relatively small population to relocate. There's your shipyard, ready to go.
||This didn't start off as being in the middle of the ocean. I
considered the idea of putting it in the Congo but decided it
would probably just perpetuate the war, so I wasn't
particularly thinking about immigration, but if something is
new land out in the middle of the ocean, all there is, is
immigration or it'd just be uninhabited. I also wanted to
put it near the equator because I thought it'd be a better
launch site, taking advantage of the velocity of the planet's
rotation at that latitude.
||Could probably do it for a couple tens of billions, from pretty much anywhere except the surface of the Earth.
||Phobos is nice this time of year. Tidelocked, and I think there's a crater facing Mars directly : a site completely shielded from cosmic radiation, with plenty of raw materials. Stop by Ceres for some ice, and you're on your way.
||but the best funding would probably be from tourists. Spend a week in orbit around the Earth for a mil', or a week on the Moon for 5.
||//relatively small population to relocate
||Jeez, the Clangers are getting evicted?
||// You've got a nearby satellite with low gravity, abundant
solar energy, no worries about biosphere pollution, untapped
mineral resources, and a relatively small population to
relocate. There's your shipyard, ready to go
||I was going to suggest South Australia but your low gravity
thing edges your suggestion ahead.