Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Call Ambulance,
Rebuild Kitchen.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                           

Passenger pedaled ferry

Make the passengers work their passage
  (+1, -2)
(+1, -2)
  [vote for,
against]

A ferry with no engine but a series of pedals between benches carrying the passengers. You get across the Channel or whatever, but under your own power, giving you a greater sense of achievement and control while being ecologically sounder. Two hundred passengers ought to provide about a hundred-odd kilowatts of power, and at that point my brain gives out and i go to bed. Goodnight.
nineteenthly, Jan 30 2009

River Gym http://www.archinode.com/gym.html
[Wily Peyote, Jan 31 2009]

A ferry http://commercial.a...ture.phtml?id=97504
As mentioned in my anno - this was the ferry I based my calculations on [MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009]

Floating bridge http://en.wikipedia...wiki/Torpoint_ferry
A type of ship these ideas could work on [MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009]

[link]






       Maybe they ought to produce 100kW, but I'm pretty sure they won't - that'd be 500W per passenger, which is out by a factor of way.
MaxwellBuchanan, Jan 30 2009
  

       Yeah you're probably looking at about 8kW at the prop, if everyone is motivated (but an average cross section of society).
Texticle, Jan 31 2009
  

       I'm on a ferry carrying up to 1500 passengers (and cars / lorries) across the channel. We use 20,000kW of power to go at 20 knots (about 25mph). Even by your calculations that means we still have 19,250kW to find. It uses a lot of energy to push water out the way! For small river crossings where you don't have to worry about waves, and you are happy to go slow, then human power is baked in the form of rowing boats (some big enough to carry horses and carts etc). Good Morning.
MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009
  

       Yes, car ferry - Big lumps of steel weighing tons. You're talking about many hundreds of tons extra. It's not going to be like that. The Channel goes woosh. I would consider a less wooshy place, maybe, presumably not the Solent, but how about the Swale or the Humber? What i want to know is, how much energy is used up by the water.
The other thought i just had is: what if there was a way of harnessing the power of the vehicle engines, maybe by putting them on treadmills? It would suffocate everyone, but that could be avoided by sticking hoses in the exhaust pipes. Then you get a reduced fare because you partly pay with your own fuel.
  

       Good morning, by the way.
nineteenthly, Jan 31 2009
  

       Oh and, checking the link, oddly i had one of my recurring dreams about NYC last night, so there you go.
nineteenthly, Jan 31 2009
  

       True enough - that's why I added the note about having cars & lorries. I imagine that our engines are a lot more efficient than running everyone's car onboard, and since we burn heavy fuel oil it's an awful lot cheaper than petrol or diesel.   

       I've done some looking up on smaller boats - the one I've linked to is a 150 pax boat that looks a bit more heavy duty than you want. It has 460 bhp which I think is 343 kW to do a max speed of 10.8 knots. As far as I remember, to double the speed you multiply the power by 8 so using your figures you should be able to do a respectable 7 knots ish. Using Texticle's figures the speed is rather lower at 3 knots. Good for crossing a narrow river, but I suspect there would be lots of power losses to get the power out of lots of people and down to the propellor. It also could be hard work when the ferry is only half full. Vote changed to a neutral because the idea is more practical than I first thought, but I think a rowing boat is probably more practical
MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009
  

       <obligatory> Add peddalling chickens for more thrrrrrrrrrust </ob>
MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009
  

       [bigsleep], yes, and i make that sort of calculation about PCs too. OK, so the engines are more efficient. In that case, why not do it the other way round? Brake the ferry by transferring the momentum into flywheels in the vehicles, or, if they're electric, into a dynamo and recharge the batteries with it.
nineteenthly, Jan 31 2009
  

       Nice idea, It is just possible to get some energy out of a ship by ' braking' - effectively let the propellors free-wheel. On a diesel electric ship, this will put electricity back onto the board, very useful in brown-outs - where you have lost one or more - but not all of the generators. The problem is this doesn't slow you down quickly enough, or under control, as you then can't steer properly. Generally to stop a ship you need to use more power by putting the engines astern. Perhaps your ideas would work on a floating bridge - a type of cross river ferry guided by chains?
MadnessInMyMethod, Jan 31 2009
  

       I can see it wouldn't be well-controlled. I'm now thinking about a paddle-steamer type arrangement with a number of rotors parallel to the direction of the ship. For braking, first one slows, then the next, until they've all stopped. As each one slows, it transfers energy to a dynamo, and you get controlled deceleration which also generates electricity for whatever purpose.   

       I haven't checked the links yet, but will do so now.
nineteenthly, Jan 31 2009
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle