h a l f b a k e r yactual product may differ from illustration
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Boomerangsoffer great potential as eco-friendly weapons
great because they creat no emissions f for proulsion and
throws that dont miss their target come back and can be
used again and thus can be recycled.
the problem with boomerangs it they afre hard to throw with
consistent acuracy
and I belive thats where robot throwing
arms could enter the picture. . with robots throwing
boomerangs all of the factors such as speed, andle and
release could be done coin a consistent and calculated way so
that the boomerang is more likely to hit their mark, also wind
speed and trajectory could be more acuatley factored than if
done instinctively by human soldier.
In conclusion , I have no experience with the subject im
talking about but If any military agency wishes to fund me I
bet I could make such a device for under 72 million dolars per
unit, or 86 Million if you wish the design to be in space grey.
I would like to thank the united nations for their time.
[link]
|
| |
This would aid in shooting around corners with the much needed spotter. Loss of punch and velocity though. This seems in the genre of knife throwing or Triffid gun. |
|
| |
//I have no experience with the subject im talking about//
Marked for punctuation and tagline. |
|
| |
//I have no experience with the subject im talking
about// - many ideas on this site are written by
people whose experiences have actively sabotaged
their ability to think rationally about the subject
their idea is about, so having no experience is a huge
plus and puts you way ahead of most people posting
here. |
|
| |
That's almost word-for-word what I told the enquiry, but
would they listen? |
|
| |
Who'd give a triffid a gun, damn dangerous as they
are..Anyway, the real question is could it do the wobble-
board properly? |
|
| |
"How're the tests with the weaponised boomerangs going,
corporal? Corporal? Hello?" |
|
| |
I think there's a much better idea hidden within this idea, likely obscured by the lack of punctuation. Why not explore and develop the potential of the robot boomerang? |
|
| |
The field of drone technology should offer some valuable assistance in creating a boomerang that, even in the hands of a child, could neuter a gnat at 400 metres. |
|
| |
Order yours today - Robot Boomerang is available for three easy payments of $1999.99*. If you place your order online right now we'll throw in (pun intended) a SECOND RB at no extra charge! |
|
| |
Fun for the whole family!!** |
|
| |
*Your account will be billed a non-refundable S&H charge of $100K per unit. |
|
| |
**In order to prevent serious injury to loved ones we recommend the purchase of the comprehensive instruction manual for $1million. |
|
| |
I will invest but the robot has to be able to catch it also. A perfectly thrown boomerang in windless conditions should return to the same spot every time. |
|
| |
Same state throughout t1 to t2, no dice. The perfectly
thrown routine/roulette ball? |
|
| |