h a l f b a k e r yMy hatstand runneth over
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This is a sports fandom website that changes its content, week by week, from supporting one team/player/sport to another, depending upon who is currently considered to be best. The criteria, like the content, change arbitrarily from week to week in order to justify support for the current 'best'. As
content & allegiance changes, all previous content is deleted so that no history of wrongness is kept on the site. Go team!
[link]
|
| |
Of course, certain "sports" will be avoided
completely, as there is no "best" team of a terrible
game, like cricket, there is only the least bad. |
|
| |
Well, for this week maybe. But next week we will be writing extensively about how great cricket is & enthusiastically expressing our undying support for the best team (currently not England, sadly). |
|
| |
I see automation is robbing Winston Smith of his job at the
memory hole. |
|
| |
In the current climate, probably both. |
|
| |
This is a bold move Cotton... let's see if it pays off. |
|
| |
//"sports" will be avoided completely// I could support this! |
|
| |
Use of cookies and internet tracking might be used to tailor
the contents to the user, such that whoever they are, the
site will reflect that their preferred team, affiliation,
geographic location, identity, educational institution etc is
definitively the best. |
|
| |
...except I think oddly enough, that this is already baked. |
|
| |
That's not going to fool anyone. Any Cubs / Lions /
Spurs fans know exactly how bad they are. |
|
| |
Good and bad aren't on the same line. Volunteering at a homeless shelter doesn't make up for my puppy kicking habit. Slapping old ladies for their backtalk doesn't negate studying hard to improve the economy. Or in terms of the words as applied to performance (i.e. good performance or bad performance) showing up late to work doesn't negate being extraordinarily helpful when at work. |
|
| |
It doesn't even do that when the only thing being measured per game is score. |
|
| |
//tailor the contents to the user//
<Steps back in horror> What??! </sbih>
Voice, I'm not sure that I get your point insofar as it relates to the idea. Could you elucidate please?
//Any...Spurs fans//
Are we talking Spurs of the San Antonio kind, or of the Tottenham kind? I know little of the former but, having known a few of them over the years, would certainly agree with you about the latter! |
|
| |
//I'm not sure that I get your point insofar as it relates to the idea. // |
|
| |
I was responding to [RayfordSteele] //less bad// |
|
| |
I was thinking San Antonio. They seem pretty lousy
this season. |
|
| |
I generally cheer for the loser, so I wouldn't spend much time
on the site unless it's to confirm whom I oppose. |
|
| |
I'll take clicks whatever the motivation! |
|
| |