Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Not so much a thought experiment as a single neuron misfire.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.



Processing Mist

A global localised network to minimise processing power required on personal machines
(+1, -1)
  [vote for,

This idea involves combining several technologies, all of which individually already exist. That doesn't mean that it's already baked.

The problem : Personal computers just arn't fast enough. They're fine for most purposes, but occasionally you need a bit more out of them and they have to think for a minute or two. This isn't acceptable. At the moment most programs use a single processor core, but as computers gain more cores as standard this is likely to change.

Background information : The internet, as it appears to home computers, is not a particularly localised entity. I think the typical case is an internet connection but no home network. In this case your computer can talk to your router, which can talk to your service providers computers, and after a few hops pretty much any other accessible computer.
This means overall that there are an awful lot of computers with a single connection, and relatively few which have many connections.

Now, I said your computer is fine for most purposes, but that's not quite true. Most of the time it's more than fast enough - it's sitting around twiddling its thumbs and wasting power.

My proposal: Computers are interconnected with nearby machines in some standard way. As the nearby machines probably are your neighbours, this probably involves agreeing with them to drill little holes in the walls and feeding cables though. Wireless communications are fine too, if they're expedient. Okay, hook everything up with a suitable router. Now there should be very fast communication between neighbouring machines - probably faster even than internet access, because your service provider is further away both in terms of distance and number of 'router hops'. Also it's possible that a simpler communication protocol could be used.

Now, this system needs some software and perhaps operating system support to make it work. This would probably work best with a system built from scratch to support it. Data from neighbouring machines needs to be sandboxed, and processing would have a lower priority than your own stuff.
Now if all that works, when your computer experiences a spike in processor load, it can farm that out to your neighbours machines, provided that they're idling. Of course, your machine reciprocates the service. There should be a process in place to make sure that usage is fair - if anyone tries to abuse the service by not honouring any processing requests they can be easily cut off.
Potentially for big jobs your neighbours could pass some things along to their other neigbours for even more speed. Latency would be great for local access but wouldn't scale well with distance. However, when your main internet connection breaks you'd still be able to talk to the world via some guy with another service-provider. Even in normal usage it may increase your burst download rate a bit.

Regarding privacy, there would probably need to be a 'work in private' option for when you're working with confidential information. Perhaps files could be tagged 'private' and never exported, too.

Once a system like this is in place, your computer need never be wasted again; you could sell (or donate) unused cycles to people with enormous massively parallel jobs. These would run with even lower priority so as to not displace your neigbours jobs. This is a big improvement on the current practice of when your screensaver is active, because your computer is probably idling a lot between keystrokes.

Oh, why that title? It's a local cloud.

Loris, Feb 15 2010

Homomorphic encryption https://en.wikipedi...omorphic_encryption
Solution to the privacy issue. [notexactly, May 13 2016]


       //A sort of SETI@home thing?//   

       While not the main purpose, you could do that sort of thing - only rather more efficiently.
Loris, Feb 15 2010

       //I'd rather not have the processing power of my personal machine further minimised, thanks anyway.//   

       But but but! Wouldn't you rather have it maximised? That is after all the point of this idea - to increase speed when it matters (effectively by sharing it when it doesn't matter).
Loris, Feb 15 2010

       I know very little about computers, but I can't think of *any* processing task that a home user would use that could be 'parallelized' for distributed computing. Multi-core processors are very different from distributed computing.
xaviergisz, Feb 15 2010

       //I can't think of *any* processing task that a home user would use that could be 'parallelized' for distributed computing.//   

       Compression of multiple files, as in a zip archive?
Encoding a home movie to some format, or just processing pictures?
Fetching stuff from the internet?
Rendering graphics: ray-tracing etc?

       All of these are widely done on home computers, are easily parallelisable to some extent and often take longer than is desirable. I'm sure there are others.
Loris, Feb 15 2010

       //...what if you don't get on with your neighbours & they refuse to participate?...//   

       It would be a sad sort of a place where everyone hated everyone else on principle.
Human civilisation is built on working together for mutual benefit, and that does seem to just generally work in practice.

       Even if you have no neighbours, you could still share load between your computers if you have more than one, and use your spare cycles for paid jobs from the internet. The existence of the system would encourage people and companies to take advantage of it, so you could still be better off.
Loris, Feb 15 2010

       // It would be a sad sort of a place where everyone hated everyone else on principle. //   

       Hi there ! Welcome to Earth ... wow, is this a WEIRD place.   

       So, where ya from ... ?   

       // Human civilisation is built on working together for mutual benefit, and that does seem to just generally work in practice. //   

       Looks like you turned over two pages at once.   

       Or maybe several chapters ....
8th of 7, May 13 2016


back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle