h a l f b a k e r y
A few slices short of a loaf.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
or get an account
Drug User's Prison
If we're going to do this at least do it right. "Single Victim Drug Crime" sentencing
Not a comment on the drug war. It's being waged, it's not going to stop any time soon and we've got to live with it. So how about dealing with emptying our prisons of drug offenders by creating specialized drug prisons that can potentially pay for themselves?
1- The first stage of a drug prison is
rehab. You get clean and sober, at least while you're there.
2- Then you go to work 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week. These would be manufacturing jobs that generate money to pay for the prisoner's upkeep. Work would be theraputic to their recovery as well.
3- Night classes are taken a couple of times a week where prisoners learn how to deal with the temptation of drugs on the outside.
4- Get caught doing drugs, making pruno or otherwise breaking the rules, straight to real prison.
I don't think people who do drugs are inherently bad. I think people who rob, steal, rape and murder ARE inherently bad. I would like to keep potentially good and irredeemably bad people in separate prisons, and I think the good people might be able to pay their way while they recovered from their addiction.
Drug users would still be in prisons so the drug warriors would be happy, these prisons would be equipped specifically to attempt re-hab rather than preventing violence so the guards would be happy and the prisoner's would pay for all of this by their hard work so I'd be happy.
Entry into these prisons would have to be earned. The prisoner would have to request it and fulfill their obligations or off to thug prison they go.
If anybody wanted to go to regular prison instead just to get out of work they're probably hopeless anyway.
It's my understanding that half our prisons are filled with people in on drug offenses so if even half of these people could make it in a drug rehab work prison we could a) save a lot of money and b) do something good for these people rather than just sending them to crime college.
The Pris Biz
Big money, big controversy [doctorremulac3, Jul 08 2014]
||So, sort of a prison that actually does what prison is
supposed to do? It'll never catch on.
||Why not imprison workers and let the drug users be
free? Then one could have a so called free society,
and a highly disciplined and efficient workforce. If
the imprisoned workers work hard enough they can
be paroled to use drugs and generally be free. Of
course this would not be the same society, prison
would be looked at as a good thing and freedom as,
well, nasty brutish and short.
||//Why not imprison workers and let the drug users be free?//
||Hey, now we're getting somewhere! See? Societies problems aren't that hard to solve.
||I say we drug the workers and offer free imprisonment for all.
||I like the idea of keeping them separate, but isn't
this already implemented somewhat by the
concept of a minimum security prisons?
||Of the 50% of people in prison for drug offenses,
how many are there just because they used drugs
or were in possession of "personal use" quantities? My impression is that most of the ones who get
significant jail time were dealing or transporting
drugs, or committed some other crime to support
their drug habit, but I could be mistaken.
||The other issue is HOW to fairly employ the
prisoners. I really like the idea of ALL prisoners at
least partially earning their keep somehow. If
implemented correctly it's good for the economy
and for the prisoners, but it seems like using
prison labor is prone to corruption. How do you
keep fair competition between prisons and private
businesses and between prisoners and free
workers competing for the same jobs. How do you
manage the work conditions for the prisoners?
There should obviously be incentives for work
(quantity and quality), but what significant
incentive can be given. Being first in line for
chow or an extra few minutes in the exercise area
only goes so far. No one will want to allow them
to accumulate money that can be used after
release, or provide significantly better amenities
in the prison.
||Actually one thing might be to make them pay for
their classes. The cost of providing education to
the prisoners might be quite cheap if it's mainly in
the form of watching taped classes, getting help
from prisoner "professors", etc, but if the prisoner
is required to earn the right to take classes based
on the amount of work they do, that might
actually work. As long as the system doesn't work
so well that people purposefully get caught for
possession so they can get free room and board
while working for a college degree.
||How's this for incentive?
||Work harder, work better, get out earlier.
||Why not? I'm not crazy about forced labor or workers having no incentive, but if this was offered to people as an alternative to just sitting around in a 8 x 12 box sucking up taxpayer money, hey.
||But for druggies only. I don't think violent criminals can be rehabilitated, and even if they can, I don't want to. Helping people with addiction issues is another matter.
||Preheated at least via existing sentencing programs referred to as "diversion" and "honor camp". Diversion keeps you out of the criminal justice sentence if you complete counseling or other requirements, and honor camp is a low security detention facility who's "employees" fight wildfires and clean up after natural disasters for a pittance.
||Do those work? If so, great.
||Maybe I'm getting my terms mixed up. When I read
that half the nation's prisoners are there for drug
related crimes, are they lumping people who rob
liquor stores to get drug money into the "drug
related" category? If so, that has nothing to do with
drugs any more than it has to do with them wearing
sneakers. At least in my opinion. If half the prisoners
are there because in addition to mugging an old lady
they had a joint on them when they got arrested,
that shouldn't be called
||But if half our prisoners really are there for getting
high and being stupid, it smacks a little of a scam.
Druggies are a lot easier to house and work with than
violent psychopaths and you get the same amount of
money to house both types. Not to sound
conspiratorial, but just sayin'.
||So since the drug war's not going anywhere soon, how
about relieving the burden to society, or at least
||Eh, not gonna happen. But it's an idea.
||It's a specialized flavor of a Minimum Security Prison,
based on low risk. I guess you could have another
flavor for financial crimes. The wall-street crime
special prison would be the same size, but with just
2 prisoners, of course.
||In some ways, financial crimes are worse than drug
use. Stealing money, by definition, will hurt
others, either particular individuals, or by causing
very small damage to a large number of people.
Maybe there are a few criminals who don't actually
understand this, but I'm not sure how to fairly
account for stupidity when giving a sentence.
Doing drugs does not inherently require that
someone else be harmed. In our current society,
drug use normally does have negative side effect
of supporting the illegal drug industry, but I
suspect that most drug user have no intention of
harming anyone else by their actions.
||Practically speaking, drug use may contribute more
to violent crime than financial crime does (unless
you can calculate the contribution of incremental
poverty increases to violent crime), but in terms
of the moral character of the person breaking the
law, I have more loathing for financial criminals.
||// Work harder, work better, get out earlier. //
Duh, why didn't I think of that...
||Now we just need out figure out how to avoid
unfair competition with private business.
||I get your concern. Is there anything these guys could do that doesn't have competition here? How about stipulating that they only do jobs that are currently done exclusively overseas? A non-domestic competition clause?
||Hmm. Now it's getting a little complicated.
||As far as financial crimes vs violent crimes, the main difference I see is violent crimes should start at 20 years in prison where as non-voilent financial crimes should start at 10 years.
||But back to the drug users, just came up with a new term for sentencing: "Single victim drug crimes" meaning that the person doing the drugs didn't hurt anybody else.
||Forget about dumping them in manufacturing. Howabout some other industry for awhile; say mining, or government. They're so good at smuggling, let them be UPS employees...
||I love the idea of farming out bureaucracies to drug prisoners. What are they gonna do? Screw it up? Foment corruption?
||I'd fill all the ambassador posts first.
||"Ok, you're in for possession, here's your orange jumpsuit and your ambassador appointment to... let's see... Nauru."
||"When they call and ask for money, tell them no. Plus you sweep up the mess hall after dinner. NEXT!"
||It seems like to make this work it's going to need
to be some kind of partnership with private
industry. I don't want some official with minimal
business experience trying to come up with some
job for the prisoners to do.
||So let's just say that any company can hire
prisoners if they work with the prison officials to
create an appropriately escape-resistant facility or
can install any equipment needed inside the
existing prison facility. We need to figure out a
way to let market forces control the wages. There
will be extra expenses due to the overhead of
working with prisoners, and these need to be
offset by lower wages (paid to the government) so
that the total cost of production using prison labor
nearly the same as regular labor. If we temporarily
ignore minimum wage laws it seems like we could
come up with a fairly efficient market based
solution. Just let companies offer to pay what
they want. Prisoners will take whatever jobs they
want. They will of course favor the higher paying
jobs moderated somewhat in some cases by the
difficulty or less ideal working conditions of those
jobs. A job that requires a secure facility outside
the prison or extensive equipment inside the
prison will likely not be able to pay as much, so
this will naturally favor job types that have less of
this type of overhead.
||That will of course get low paid non-prison all up in
arms. Trying to take jobs only form foreign
workers is not really implementable because
there's nothing from stopping a company from
outsourcing a job to China then transferring the
work to prisons shortly afterwards. Here's what
could be done however. (Still pretending there is
no minimum wage) Presumably, this system will
cause all wages to drop slightly. This will likely
have the largest effect on low wage jobs and very
little effect on jobs requiring more education
(though having software developers working from
a prison wouldn't be completely impossible). But
this is not a zero sum game. If labor is cheaper a
company will be able to produce their product for
less. To sell the extra merchandise, they will have
to lower the cost to move down the
supply/demand curve. In most cases this should
still result in slightly higher profit per unit
produced. So, take half of the money earned by
the prisoners (or maybe anything left over after
paying for the overhead of this program), and fund
some kind of negative income tax type scheme.
||If we don't ignore the minimum wage, this gets
much more difficult. The simple solution might be
to simply have a lower minimum wage for prison
labor that is set based on the presumed additional
overhead costs, but that could be unfair in some
||And of course getting this started is likely to be
very messy. Markets can work pretty well for
keeping things balanced once they are
established, but since the market and costs will be
unknown at first, only companies that expect to
have a very large profit will even attempt it,
leading to accusations of profiteering. And then if
the market gets established and takes off, the
profits for those early adopters will drop, making
||Interesting (if not un-biased) article on the subject. (link)
||Prisons are big business, but the pris biz carries a lot of controversy baggage with it.