h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
<a little tentative making my first post a suggested change to the site but (with all due respect) here goes...> As with any site that allows users to post comments etc. the Halfbakery suffers from rants and trolls. Trolls will probably always be a problem, but rants I believe could be somewhat undermined
by careful choice of usernames.
What I suggest is that we use a similar method to those swearing filters some software comes with. With these there is a large text file of all banned words, which are checked against words the user enters, replacing swearing with ***** perhaps. But instead of swearing in the Halfbakery version of this file, we add as many inherently daft-sounding words as possible. Possible examples: wang, shampoo, trellis, bong, cheesemonger, knob, Spam and so on.
When a user creates an account, they are required to use only these words, *otherwise* non-stupid parts of their username are automatically replaced by words in this file. Now, when this happens:
john_smith: This is not a rant, BUT the REAL problem with the IRISH is
.(rant rant rant) steven_jones:How can you say that!!! You are so STUPID
.
it would become:
large_donkey_wang: This is not a rant, BUT the REAL problem with the IRISH is
.
and hopefully that would be the end of that thread because who could in any seriousness argue with someone called large_donkey_wang?
</a little tentative making my first post a suggested change to the site but (with all due) respect here goes...>
Based on thumbwax's observation in this diatribe
http://www.halfbake...o-Lenient_20Phrases [custardlove, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Wang
http://www.penny-ar...te=2000-09-22&res=l Reminds me of this comic strip [jivetalkinrobot, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
[link]
|
|
Amid the clever and amusing nics on this site, there is a large number of very, *very* stupid usernames, too.
<manages to stop self casting first stone> |
|
|
I thought this was going to be that if we were all called Bottomsworth-Smythe our sensibilities would be raised to the extent that ranting would be far below us. |
|
|
// could in any seriousness argue with someone called large_donkey_wang // |
|
|
I once corresponded via letter for several years, and had many illuminating discussions with large_donkey_wang on topics such as syndicalist fundamentalism in post-industrialized nations corroborated by neo-socialist dogma, theories of relativistic gravitation in quantum flux spacetime, and fluid dynamics in graviton-induced plasma fields. |
|
|
large_donkey_wang is one of the world's brightest and most renowned critical thinkers of this century. You should read his auto-biography, titled "large_donkey_wang: Because It's There." |
|
|
Not to mention his motivational seminars "The large_donkey_wang That Could." |
|
| |