Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
I think, therefore I am thinking.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.




How about a remote control that doesn't suck?
  [vote for,

Okay, I'm a programmer and have chronic wrist/hand pain (like a lot of us do, unfortunately). So I pay attention to how much effort any given task takes, and stabbing at buttons on, e.g., television remote controls is a waste of perfectly good health - - besides, does anybody really think their remote is hot stuff? Ha!

So I propose something that isn't such an egregious violation of human interface design standards: a spherical remote whose hemispheres rotate independently (put one palm on the northern hemisphere, one on the southern, and twist). There are faint little notches within it so that when you twist it, it "catches" at each point -- gives it discrete values rather than a full-analog-type motion. There's a small sensor that detects which hemisphere is "up".

There are a few buttons just north and south of the remote's "equator"; cup your hands around an invisible softball -- the buttons are roughly where your fingertips lie.

Say the northern hemisphere is on top -- when you twist it (holding the southern steady), it cycles through every channel you have. It has an accelerometer built into it, so if you twist it real fast you can jump, say, from channel 1 to 50 in a quarter turn; but if you twist it slowly through the same physical range, you might only go from 1 to 20.

When the southern hemisphere is on top, it cycles through your favorite channels. There's a button that toggles a given channel into/out of your favorites: if the northern hemisphere is on top and the current channel isn't a favorite yet, hitting the button adds it; if the southern hemisphere is on top and the current channel is a favorite, hitting the button removes it.

You can have a modal button that, when pressed, makes twisting the remote adjust the volume. Some other button could set the remote to control your VCR or DVD player -- obviously, twisting is FF/RW; w/DVD, maybe the northern hemisphere governs FF/RW and the southern skips through scenes. In the remote's setup stuff (menus handled a la Apple iPod's wheel, perhaps), you should be able to set the sensitivity of the accelerometer (I'd set mine very high).

There are plenty of other buttons (what, five total per hemisphere?) to handle special tasks like power on/off, mute, etc. Have a sexy cradle for the thing, too -- maybe that's where it gets charged. You could get nuts and have the remote sense whether or not it's being held (test for heat? conductivity? you could do it) so that you could still toss the thing on the couch and not have it change channels on you.

Anyway, IMO this has lots of sex appeal over a normal remote and is a huge leap forward in terms of ergonomics. Werd.

MacBellend, Mar 16 2003

This could be you http://www.homevide...oscomedy/sleep.jpeg
[thumbwax, Oct 17 2004]

The Pokeball http://ndnet.hyperm...et/See/pokeball.jpg
[my face your, Oct 17 2004]

"Ergonomic" remote control with programmable thumbpad http://www.celadon...._remote_control.htm
[pottedstu, Oct 17 2004]


       Forgot the most important part: my brilliant friend Kevin birthed this and we brainstormed implementation ideas and the featureset one night. Props to K.
MacBellend, Mar 16 2003

       //There are a few buttons just north and south of the remote's "equator"; cup your hands around an invisible softball//   

       - you mean I have to put down my beer to operate the remote? (-)
Cedar Park, Mar 16 2003

       good point -- not necessarily. the notched feel when rotating the thing should be really quite faint -- and perhaps tuneable. maybe the thing's sitting next to you on the couch and you reach over, roll it so the desired hemisphere is up, and just twist by using the friction against the couch to hold the underside. maybe the thing's rubbery to give it extra stick in that situation.
MacBellend, Mar 16 2003

       You had me until //sex appeal//and won me back with //Werd.//
my face your, Mar 16 2003

       Is this really going to be better for those with problems with wrist or finger movement? It is possible to operate a conventional remote control with minimal hand movement (by moving your whole arm), but this sphere requires fine adjustment and precise wrist movement.   

       There are special remote controls with large buttons for those who find ordinary models too fiddly, and placing a conventional control on a flat surface makes it even easier to use.   

       This may be sexy, but surely not ergonomic.
pottedstu, Mar 16 2003

       [pottedstu] No, actually it is lots better for those with carpal tunnel, cubital tunnel, and various other similar syndromes. The problem with normal remotes is having to use a couple fingers to stab at something -- this caused me immense pain after my wrists went the first time.   

       But loosely cradling something that fits the hand and whose twist sensitivity you could adjust would be really easy on the hands. For the most part, you could do it with your palms (or one if the thing's sitting on the couch), and you can lever your elbows to make it so that your wrists can be kept perfectly straight, if need be.   

       Increasing button size is more often done for improved readability or people with a palsy, but it doesn't change the basic stab/press required.   

       Anyone have ideas for what the buttons should be? Eventually some electrical engineer will straggle along and the three of us (he, K., and i) can try out a prototype.
MacBellend, Mar 16 2003

       This is excellent! Repetitive motion syndrome or no, it's a cool design concept, and I'll be susrprised if Sharper Image or Bang & Olafson aren't rolling this out as I type.   

       I lose my remote often, too, and I bet if it were spherical, it would be easier to find (it's usually under a magazine or something).   

       Plus, think of Woody Allen's "Sleeper."   

snarfyguy, Mar 16 2003

       I was thinking of Pokemon.
my face your, Mar 16 2003

       MacBelland: my concern is that such a motion is actually pretty awkward. As I understand it, you are having to pivot at your wrist to turn this, in a motion similar to opening a jar, which is not the most natural of movements for anyone.
pottedstu, Mar 16 2003

       The status of the whole ergonomic "advantage" should probably be reduced to a marketing element, even though it's the impetus for the idea. Regardless of whether it's good for you, it's cool design (except it might tend to roll away).
snarfyguy, Mar 16 2003


back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle